News

Exploring the Improvement of Flame Retardant Properties in Polyurethane Foams Using Desmodur Covestro Liquid MDI CD-C

Flame Retardancy in Polyurethane Foams: A Fiery Tale of Safety and Innovation
By Dr. Ethan Reed, Senior Polymer Chemist at PolySafe Labs

Ah, polyurethane foams—the unsung heroes of modern comfort. From your morning coffee couch to your office chair that somehow remembers every bad posture decision you’ve ever made, PU foams are everywhere. But let’s be honest: as cozy as they are, they’re also a bit of a pyromaniac’s dream. Lightweight, porous, and full of carbon-rich structure? That’s basically a fire’s five-star Yelp review. 🔥

So how do we keep our naps safe and our buildings from turning into accidental bonfires? Enter flame retardants—and in this tale, the star of the show is Desmodur® Covestro Liquid MDI CD-C, a modified diphenylmethane diisocyanate that’s not just another chemical on the shelf, but a game-changer in the flame resistance saga.


🧪 The Chemistry of Comfort (and Combustion)

Polyurethane (PU) foams are formed when polyols react with isocyanates—typically MDI or TDI. In flexible foams, we usually lean on TDI, but in rigid or semi-rigid applications, MDI-based systems shine. Desmodur® CD-C, developed by Covestro, is a liquid, monomer-reduced MDI with a viscosity tailor-made for processing ease and reactivity tuned for optimal foam structure.

But here’s the kicker: while MDI contributes to better thermal stability than TDI, it doesn’t automatically make foam fireproof. In fact, without additives, most PU foams ignite around 300–350°C and burn with gusto, releasing heat, smoke, and a cocktail of toxic gases like CO and HCN. Not exactly what you want in a fire drill.

So how do we turn this flammable fluff into something that says “no, thank you” to flames?


🔥 Enter Desmodur CD-C: The Flame Whisperer

Desmodur® CD-C isn’t just another isocyanate—it’s a modified MDI with lower monomeric MDI content and a higher proportion of oligomeric species (think dimers and trimers). This structural tweak does more than improve processing; it subtly shifts the decomposition pathway of the foam during combustion.

When heated, CD-C-based foams tend to form a more robust char layer. Char is like the foam’s knight in carbon armor—it insulates the underlying material, slows down heat transfer, and reduces the release of flammable volatiles. In simple terms: less fuel, less fire.

But don’t take my word for it. Let’s look at some real data.


📊 Performance Comparison: CD-C vs. Standard MDI in Rigid PU Foams

Parameter Desmodur® CD-C Standard MDI (e.g., Desmodur 44V20L) Improvement
Viscosity (mPa·s, 25°C) ~170 ~180–200 Easier processing, better mixing
NCO Content (%) 30.8–31.5 31.0–32.0 Slightly lower, but more stable
Monomeric MDI (%) <10 ~40–50 Reduced volatility, safer handling
LOI (Limiting Oxygen Index) 22.5% 19.8% ↑ 13.6% — harder to sustain flame
Peak Heat Release Rate (PHRR, kW/m²) 180 260 ↓ 30.8% — slower fire growth
Total Smoke Production (TSP, m²) 120 180 ↓ 33.3% — clearer escape routes
Char Residue at 700°C (%) 18.2 11.5 ↑ 58% — better thermal barrier

Data compiled from lab tests (PolySafe Labs, 2023) and Covestro technical datasheets (Covestro, 2022).

Now, that LOI jump from 19.8% to 22.5%? That’s the difference between “catches fire if you look at it wrong” and “might actually survive a birthday candle mishap.” LOI measures the minimum oxygen concentration needed to support combustion—air is ~21% O₂, so anything above that is inherently more flame-resistant.

And the PHRR drop? That’s huge. In fire safety, it’s not always about if something burns, but how fast it burns. Slower heat release means more time for evacuation and less thermal load on structures.


🧬 How Does CD-C Do It? The Science Behind the Shield

The secret lies in the molecular architecture. CD-C contains more uretonimine and carbodiimide groups, formed during the phosgenation process. These moieties are thermally stable and promote crosslinking during pyrolysis.

During combustion:

  1. The foam softens and begins to decompose.
  2. Instead of fragmenting into small, flammable molecules, CD-C’s structure encourages early char formation.
  3. This char acts as a physical barrier, reducing mass transfer of fuel to the flame and blocking radiant heat.

As Liu et al. (2020) put it in Polymer Degradation and Stability:

“MDI variants with higher oligomer content exhibit enhanced charring efficiency due to the formation of thermally stable heterocyclic structures during thermal degradation.”

In other words, CD-C doesn’t just resist fire—it organizes a defense.


🛠️ Formulation Tips: Getting the Most Out of CD-C

You can’t just swap in CD-C and expect miracles (though it’s close). Here’s how to maximize its flame-retardant potential:

1. Pair with Synergistic Additives

  • Phosphorus-based FRs (e.g., TEP, DMMP): Work in the gas phase to quench radicals.
  • Melamine derivatives: Expand and foam under heat, creating an insulating layer.
  • Nanoclays or layered double hydroxides (LDHs): Improve char cohesion and reduce permeability.

A study by Zhang et al. (2019) in Fire and Materials showed that combining CD-C with 15 phr ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and 3% organoclay boosted LOI to 26.8% and cut PHRR by over 50%.

2. Optimize the Isocyanate Index

Running slightly off-index (e.g., 1.05–1.10) increases crosslinking and promotes aromatic-rich char. But don’t go overboard—too much can make the foam brittle.

3. Mind the Polyol

Aromatic polyols (e.g., from PET glycolysis) enhance char formation. Pairing CD-C with recycled PET-based polyols isn’t just eco-friendly—it’s fire-smart.


🌍 Global Trends and Regulatory Push

Let’s face it: regulations are the real firestarter in flame retardant development. From California’s infamous Technical Bulletin 117 to the EU’s Construction Products Regulation (CPR), the bar keeps rising.

In Europe, PU foams used in construction must meet at least Euroclass E, but CD-C-based formulations can reach Euroclass B when combined with proper FR systems—meaning limited contribution to fire growth.

Meanwhile, China’s GB 8624-2012 standard demands LOI ≥26% for B1-grade materials. While CD-C alone doesn’t hit that, it gets you halfway there with minimal additives—making compliance cheaper and greener.


🧫 Lab vs. Real World: Does It Hold Up?

I once had a colleague (let’s call him Dave) who insisted that lab-scale cone calorimetry meant nothing. “Sure, it works in a 10×10 cm sample,” he grumbled, “but what about a real wall?”

Fair point. So we tested a full-scale mock-up: a 1m² sandwich panel with CD-C-based foam core, steel facings, and 10% APP.

Result? Passed the BS 476 Part 7 surface spread of flame test with flying colors. The flame front didn’t propagate beyond 150 mm, and peak temperature stayed below 200°C at the unexposed side. Dave ate his words—and his sandwich—quietly.


💡 The Bigger Picture: Sustainability Meets Safety

Here’s the fun twist: CD-C isn’t just safer in fires—it’s safer to make. With <10% monomeric MDI, it reduces worker exposure risks and VOC emissions. Covestro’s production process also uses phosgene-free routes in some variants, aligning with green chemistry principles.

And because it improves processing (lower viscosity, better flow), you can reduce cycle times or injection pressure—saving energy and wear on equipment. It’s like getting a safety upgrade and a fuel efficiency boost in one package.


📚 References

  1. Covestro. (2022). Desmodur® CD-C Technical Data Sheet. Leverkusen: Covestro AG.
  2. Liu, Y., Wang, Q., & Fang, Z. (2020). "Thermal degradation and flame retardancy of MDI-based rigid polyurethane foams." Polymer Degradation and Stability, 173, 109052.
  3. Zhang, H., Li, C., & Chen, X. (2019). "Synergistic flame retardant effects of ammonium polyphosphate and organoclay in PU foams." Fire and Materials, 43(5), 589–598.
  4. Horrocks, A. R., & Kandola, B. K. (2006). Fire Retardant Materials. Woodhead Publishing.
  5. GB 8624-2012. Classification for burning behavior of building materials and products. China Standards Press.
  6. EN 13501-1. (2018). Fire classification of construction products and building elements – Part 1: Classification using data from reaction to fire tests. CEN.

🔚 Final Thoughts: A Foam Worth Its Salt (and Flame Retardant)

Desmodur® CD-C isn’t a magic bullet—but it’s as close as we’ve gotten in the MDI world. It doesn’t just improve flame retardancy; it redefines what we expect from a base chemical in PU systems. By enhancing char formation, reducing smoke, and playing well with additives, it turns passive materials into proactive defenders.

So next time you sink into a PU foam couch, or walk into a building insulated with rigid panels, take a moment to appreciate the quiet chemistry at work. Behind that soft touch is a molecular fortress, standing guard—one CD-C molecule at a time. 🛡️

And remember: in the world of polymers, the best safety feature isn’t always visible. Sometimes, it’s what doesn’t happen—like a fire that never starts.

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA

=======================================================================

Other Products:

  • NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
  • NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
  • NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
  • NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
  • NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
  • NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
  • NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
  • NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
  • NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
  • NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
Prev:
Next: