Polyurethane Two-Component Catalyst for low emission automotive interior components

Polyurethane Two-Component Catalyst Systems for Low Emission Automotive Interior Components

Abstract: The automotive industry faces increasing pressure to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from interior components to improve air quality and meet stringent environmental regulations. Polyurethane (PU) materials, widely used in automotive interiors for their versatility and performance, are significant contributors to these emissions. This article explores the crucial role of two-component (2K) catalyst systems in achieving low-emission PU formulations for automotive interior applications. It examines the mechanisms of PU formation, the impact of catalysts on VOC emissions, and the various types of catalysts employed in 2K systems, including their advantages, disadvantages, and specific applications. Furthermore, it delves into the formulation strategies for minimizing VOC emissions, focusing on catalyst selection, optimization of reaction kinetics, and the use of additives. Finally, the article discusses product parameters and testing methods for evaluating the performance and emission characteristics of low-emission PU systems.

1. Introduction

The automotive industry is undergoing a significant shift towards sustainable manufacturing practices, driven by increasingly stringent environmental regulations and growing consumer awareness of the impact of vehicle emissions on air quality. Interior components, such as dashboards, seating, and trim, are major sources of VOCs within the vehicle cabin. These VOCs can contribute to health problems, including respiratory irritation, headaches, and allergic reactions, and contribute to the "new car smell," often perceived negatively by consumers.

Polyurethane (PU) materials are extensively used in automotive interiors due to their excellent mechanical properties, durability, comfort, and design flexibility. However, conventional PU formulations often contain catalysts and other additives that can release VOCs during and after the manufacturing process. These VOCs originate from unreacted raw materials, byproducts of the polymerization reaction, and decomposition products of additives.

To address this challenge, the development of low-emission PU systems has become a critical focus for the automotive industry. Two-component (2K) PU systems offer a viable approach to achieving low VOC emissions by allowing for precise control over the reaction kinetics and the selection of catalysts and other additives.

This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of 2K catalyst systems for low-emission automotive interior components, covering the following key aspects:

• Mechanisms of PU formation and the role of catalysts
• Impact of catalysts on VOC emissions
• Types of catalysts used in 2K systems
• Formulation strategies for minimizing VOC emissions
• Product parameters and testing methods

2. Polyurethane Formation and the Role of Catalysts

Polyurethane is formed through the step-growth polymerization reaction between a polyol (containing multiple hydroxyl groups) and an isocyanate (containing one or more isocyanate groups, -NCO). The basic reaction is:

R-NCO + R’-OH → R-NH-COO-R’

This reaction yields a urethane linkage (-NH-COO-), which is the characteristic functional group of polyurethanes.

The reaction between isocyanates and polyols is relatively slow at room temperature. Therefore, catalysts are typically employed to accelerate the reaction rate and achieve the desired processing characteristics. Catalysts play a crucial role in:

• Lowering the activation energy: Catalysts reduce the energy barrier required for the reaction to proceed, resulting in faster polymerization.
• Controlling the reaction rate: Different catalysts exhibit varying degrees of activity, allowing for precise control over the reaction rate and the curing process.
• Influencing the selectivity: Some catalysts preferentially promote specific reactions, such as the urethane reaction or the isocyanate trimerization reaction, which affects the final properties of the PU material.

In 2K PU systems, the polyol component (Component A) typically contains the catalyst and other additives, while the isocyanate component (Component B) is stored separately. Upon mixing, the reaction initiates, and the PU material is formed.

3. Impact of Catalysts on VOC Emissions

The selection of catalysts significantly impacts the VOC emissions from PU materials. Certain catalysts can contribute directly or indirectly to VOC formation through several mechanisms:

• Catalyst volatility: Some catalysts, particularly tertiary amines, are volatile and can be released into the environment during and after the curing process.
• Catalyst degradation: Certain catalysts can decompose at elevated temperatures or under humid conditions, generating volatile byproducts.
• Side reactions: Some catalysts can promote undesirable side reactions, such as the formation of allophanate or biuret linkages, which can lead to the generation of VOCs.
• Unreacted raw materials: Inefficient catalysts can lead to incomplete reaction of polyol and isocyanate, leaving residual unreacted monomers that can evaporate over time.

Therefore, the selection of low-emission catalysts is crucial for minimizing VOC emissions from PU materials. These catalysts should exhibit the following characteristics:

• Low volatility: The catalyst should have a low vapor pressure to minimize its evaporation from the PU matrix.
• High reactivity: The catalyst should be highly effective in promoting the urethane reaction to ensure complete conversion of reactants.
• Good stability: The catalyst should be stable under typical processing and service conditions to prevent degradation and the formation of volatile byproducts.
• Minimal side reactions: The catalyst should selectively promote the urethane reaction and minimize the formation of undesirable side products.

4. Types of Catalysts Used in 2K Systems for Low Emission Applications

Several types of catalysts are used in 2K PU systems for low-emission automotive interior components. Each type exhibits unique characteristics and advantages, making them suitable for specific applications.

Catalyst Type	Advantages	Disadvantages	Applications
Tertiary Amines	High catalytic activity, widely used, relatively inexpensive.	High volatility, strong odor, potential for VOC emissions, can promote side reactions (e.g., blowing reaction with water).	Traditional PU foams and coatings, where VOC emissions are not a primary concern. Generally not suitable for low-emission applications.
Organometallic Catalysts (e.g., Tin)	High catalytic activity, promote both urethane and isocyanate trimerization reactions, good mechanical properties.	Toxicity concerns, potential for VOC emissions due to degradation, can hydrolyze in the presence of moisture.	Rigid PU foams, coatings, and adhesives. Alternatives with better toxicity profiles are preferred for interior automotive applications.
Bismuth Catalysts	Lower toxicity than tin catalysts, good catalytic activity, promote urethane reaction.	Can be less active than tin catalysts, may require higher concentrations, can be more expensive.	Flexible PU foams, coatings, and adhesives. Becoming increasingly popular for low-emission applications.
Zinc Catalysts	Relatively low toxicity, promote urethane reaction, good adhesion properties.	Lower catalytic activity than tin or bismuth catalysts, may require higher concentrations.	Coatings and adhesives. Often used in combination with other catalysts to achieve desired performance.
Delayed-Action Catalysts	Provide extended pot life, allow for complex part geometry, reduce surface defects.	Can be more expensive, require careful formulation to achieve desired activation temperature.	Large automotive interior components, complex molds, where long processing times are required. Useful for controlling reaction kinetics to minimize VOC formation.
Reactive Amines	Incorporated into the PU matrix during the reaction, reducing VOC emissions, improved long-term stability.	Can be more expensive, require careful formulation to ensure complete incorporation.	Low-emission flexible foams and coatings. A promising approach for achieving ultra-low VOC emissions.
Encapsulated Catalysts	Reduced VOC emissions, improved handling and storage stability, controlled release of catalyst.	Can be more expensive, require careful selection of encapsulation material.	Automotive seating, dashboards, and other interior components where precise control over the reaction rate and VOC emissions is critical. A growing trend in low-emission PU formulation.

4.1 Tertiary Amine Catalysts

Tertiary amines are widely used catalysts in PU chemistry due to their high activity and relatively low cost. They accelerate the reaction by coordinating with the hydroxyl group of the polyol, making it more nucleophilic and reactive towards the isocyanate group. However, many tertiary amines are volatile and contribute significantly to VOC emissions. Examples include triethylenediamine (TEDA), dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCHA), and dimethylethanolamine (DMEA).

Due to their high VOC potential, traditional tertiary amine catalysts are generally not suitable for low-emission automotive interior applications. However, modified tertiary amines with reduced volatility or reactive amine catalysts are being developed to address this issue.

4.2 Organometallic Catalysts

Organometallic catalysts, such as tin compounds (e.g., dibutyltin dilaurate – DBTDL), are highly effective in promoting both the urethane reaction and the isocyanate trimerization reaction. They offer excellent control over the reaction kinetics and contribute to the formation of rigid PU structures with good mechanical properties. However, tin catalysts are associated with toxicity concerns and can contribute to VOC emissions due to degradation and hydrolysis.

While still used in some applications, the automotive industry is increasingly moving away from tin catalysts towards less toxic alternatives.

4.3 Bismuth Catalysts

Bismuth catalysts are considered a less toxic alternative to tin catalysts and offer good catalytic activity for the urethane reaction. They are becoming increasingly popular in low-emission PU formulations for automotive interior components. Bismuth carboxylates, such as bismuth octoate and bismuth neodecanoate, are commonly used.

Bismuth catalysts can be used in combination with other catalysts to achieve the desired balance of reactivity and performance characteristics.

4.4 Zinc Catalysts

Zinc catalysts, such as zinc octoate and zinc neodecanoate, offer relatively low toxicity and promote the urethane reaction. They also contribute to good adhesion properties. However, zinc catalysts typically exhibit lower catalytic activity compared to tin or bismuth catalysts.

Zinc catalysts are often used in combination with other catalysts to optimize the overall performance of the PU system.

4.5 Delayed-Action Catalysts

Delayed-action catalysts provide extended pot life, allowing for complex part geometry and reducing surface defects. These catalysts are activated by heat or other stimuli, enabling the PU system to remain unreactive for a longer period before curing.

Examples include blocked amine catalysts and catalysts that are activated by moisture. Delayed-action catalysts are particularly useful for large automotive interior components where long processing times are required.

4.6 Reactive Amine Catalysts

Reactive amine catalysts contain functional groups that allow them to be incorporated into the PU matrix during the reaction. This reduces VOC emissions by preventing the catalyst from evaporating from the PU material. Reactive amines can be designed to react with isocyanate groups or hydroxyl groups, becoming permanently bound to the PU network.

Reactive amine catalysts offer a promising approach for achieving ultra-low VOC emissions in flexible foams and coatings.

4.7 Encapsulated Catalysts

Encapsulated catalysts are surrounded by a protective coating that prevents them from reacting until a specific trigger is applied, such as heat or pressure. This allows for improved handling and storage stability, controlled release of the catalyst, and reduced VOC emissions. The encapsulation material can be designed to dissolve or rupture under specific conditions, releasing the catalyst and initiating the PU reaction.

Encapsulated catalysts are particularly useful for automotive seating, dashboards, and other interior components where precise control over the reaction rate and VOC emissions is critical.

5. Formulation Strategies for Minimizing VOC Emissions

In addition to selecting low-emission catalysts, several other formulation strategies can be employed to minimize VOC emissions from PU materials:

• Optimizing Reaction Kinetics: Controlling the reaction rate and ensuring complete conversion of reactants is crucial for minimizing VOC emissions. This can be achieved by carefully selecting the catalyst type and concentration, adjusting the polyol-to-isocyanate ratio (NCO index), and optimizing the curing temperature and time.
• Using High Molecular Weight Polyols: High molecular weight polyols tend to have lower volatility compared to low molecular weight polyols, reducing VOC emissions.
• Employing Scavengers: VOC scavengers are additives that react with or absorb VOCs, reducing their concentration in the air. Examples include activated carbon, zeolites, and amine-based scavengers.
• Using Additives with Low VOC Content: All additives, including surfactants, flame retardants, and pigments, should be carefully selected to ensure they have low VOC content.
• Optimizing Curing Conditions: Optimizing the curing temperature and time can help to ensure complete conversion of reactants and minimize the formation of volatile byproducts.
• Post-Curing Treatment: Post-curing at elevated temperatures can help to remove residual VOCs from the PU material.
• Use of Chain Extenders/Crosslinkers: Selecting appropriate chain extenders (e.g., diols) and crosslinkers (e.g., triols) can influence the network structure and potentially reduce VOC emissions by promoting a more complete reaction.

Table 2: Impact of Formulation Parameters on VOC Emissions

Parameter	Impact on VOC Emissions	Mitigation Strategies
Catalyst Type	High VOC catalysts (e.g., volatile tertiary amines) increase VOC emissions.	Use low-VOC catalysts (e.g., bismuth, zinc, reactive amines, encapsulated catalysts).
Catalyst Loading	Excessive catalyst loading can lead to incomplete reaction and increased VOC emissions.	Optimize catalyst loading to achieve desired reaction rate without excess.
NCO Index	Imbalance between polyol and isocyanate can lead to unreacted monomers and increased VOC emissions.	Maintain optimal NCO index (typically around 100) to ensure complete reaction.
Polyol Molecular Weight	Low molecular weight polyols are more volatile and contribute to VOC emissions.	Use high molecular weight polyols to reduce volatility.
Additives	VOC-containing additives (e.g., solvents, plasticizers) increase VOC emissions.	Select low-VOC alternatives or minimize additive usage.
Curing Temperature	Insufficient curing temperature can lead to incomplete reaction and increased VOC emissions. Excessive temperature can lead to catalyst decomposition and VOC formation.	Optimize curing temperature to achieve complete reaction without degradation.
Curing Time	Insufficient curing time can lead to incomplete reaction and increased VOC emissions.	Optimize curing time to ensure complete reaction.
Humidity	High humidity can lead to side reactions and VOC formation.	Control humidity during processing.

6. Product Parameters and Testing Methods

The performance and emission characteristics of low-emission PU systems are evaluated using a variety of product parameters and testing methods.

6.1 Physical and Mechanical Properties:

• Tensile Strength and Elongation: Measured according to ASTM D412.
• Tear Strength: Measured according to ASTM D624.
• Hardness: Measured using a durometer according to ASTM D2240.
• Density: Measured according to ASTM D792.
• Compression Set: Measured according to ASTM D395.
• Flex Fatigue: Evaluates the resistance to cracking or failure under repeated bending or flexing.

6.2 Emission Testing:

• VOC Emission Testing: Measured using chamber methods according to ISO 12219-1, VDA 278, or similar standards. Samples are placed in a controlled environment chamber, and the air is analyzed for VOCs using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
• Formaldehyde Emission Testing: Measured using chamber methods according to ISO 16000-3 or similar standards.
• Fogging Test: Evaluates the propensity of the material to release volatile substances that condense on glass surfaces, reducing visibility. This is typically measured according to DIN 75201 or SAE J1756.
• Odor Testing: Subjective evaluation of the odor of the material using a panel of trained assessors.

6.3 Durability and Aging:

• UV Resistance: Evaluates the resistance to degradation under exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation according to ASTM G154.
• Thermal Aging: Evaluates the resistance to degradation under prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures according to ASTM D573.
• Hydrolytic Stability: Evaluates the resistance to degradation under exposure to moisture according to ASTM D3137.
• Chemical Resistance: Evaluates the resistance to degradation under exposure to various chemicals, such as acids, bases, and solvents.

Table 3: Common Testing Methods for Low-Emission PU Systems

Test Method	Description	Standard
VOC Emission	Measures the total volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from a material in a controlled environment chamber.	ISO 12219-1, VDA 278, ASTM D6196
Formaldehyde Emission	Measures the formaldehyde emissions from a material in a controlled environment chamber.	ISO 16000-3
Fogging Test	Evaluates the propensity of a material to release volatile substances that condense on glass surfaces.	DIN 75201, SAE J1756
Odor Test	Subjective evaluation of the odor of a material using a panel of trained assessors.	VDA 270
Tensile Strength	Measures the force required to break a material under tension.	ASTM D412
Elongation	Measures the amount a material stretches before breaking under tension.	ASTM D412
Hardness	Measures the resistance of a material to indentation.	ASTM D2240
UV Resistance	Evaluates the resistance of a material to degradation under exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation.	ASTM G154
Thermal Aging	Evaluates the resistance of a material to degradation under prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures.	ASTM D573

7. Conclusion

The development of low-emission PU systems for automotive interior components is essential for improving air quality and meeting increasingly stringent environmental regulations. Two-component catalyst systems offer a viable approach to achieving low VOC emissions by allowing for precise control over the reaction kinetics and the selection of catalysts and other additives.

The selection of low-emission catalysts, such as bismuth catalysts, zinc catalysts, reactive amines, and encapsulated catalysts, is crucial for minimizing VOC emissions. In addition, formulation strategies, such as optimizing reaction kinetics, using high molecular weight polyols, employing VOC scavengers, and optimizing curing conditions, can further reduce VOC emissions.

By carefully considering the catalyst type, formulation parameters, and processing conditions, it is possible to develop low-emission PU systems that meet the demanding performance requirements of automotive interior applications while minimizing their impact on air quality. Continued research and development in this area are crucial for further reducing VOC emissions and promoting sustainable manufacturing practices in the automotive industry.

Literature Sources:

• Saunders, J. H., & Frisch, K. C. (1962). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology, Part I: Chemistry. Interscience Publishers.
• Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
• Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
• Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
• Szycher, M. (1999). Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes. CRC Press.
• ISO 12219-1:2012. Interior air of road vehicles – Part 1: Whole vehicle test chamber – Specification and method for the determination of volatile organic compounds.
• VDA 278:2011. Thermal Desorption Analysis of Organic Emissions for the Characterization of Non-Metallic Materials.
• DIN 75201:2011. Determination of the Condensation Behaviour of Trim Materials in the Interior of Motor Vehicles.
• ASTM D412-16: Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers—Tension.
• ASTM D624-00(2012): Standard Test Method for Tear Strength of Conventional Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers.
• ASTM D2240-15: Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness.
• ASTM D792-20: Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement.
• ASTM D395-18: Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property—Compression Set.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com