News

A comparative analysis of Peroxides for Photovoltaic Solar Film versus other curing agents for solar encapsulants

A Comparative Analysis of Peroxides for Photovoltaic Solar Film versus Other Curing Agents for Solar Encapsulants


When it comes to solar panels, the sun may be the star of the show, but behind the scenes, a host of chemical actors play crucial roles in ensuring these panels perform efficiently and endure the test of time. Among them, curing agents — the unsung heroes of solar encapsulation — are the quiet protectors of the delicate photovoltaic (PV) cells within.

Now, if you’re thinking, "Encapsulation? Curing agents? What’s all that about?" — don’t worry, you’re not alone. Most people don’t think twice about the chemistry behind their rooftop solar panels. But if you’re in the business of manufacturing or researching solar technology, then understanding the role of curing agents like peroxides versus other alternatives is not just interesting — it’s essential.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into the world of solar encapsulants, comparing peroxides with other curing agents like silane crosslinkers, peroxide-free systems, and UV initiators. We’ll explore their chemical properties, performance metrics, environmental impacts, and cost implications — all while keeping things light, informative, and yes, even a little fun.


🌞 What Are Solar Encapsulants?

Before we dive into the curing agents themselves, let’s take a moment to understand what solar encapsulants actually do. These materials are like the bodyguards of solar cells — they protect the fragile silicon wafers from moisture, mechanical stress, and UV degradation. Without proper encapsulation, solar panels would be prone to delamination, corrosion, and a significant drop in efficiency over time.

The most common encapsulant materials used in the PV industry are:

  • EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate)
  • POE (Polyolefin Elastomers)
  • Silicones
  • TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane)

Each of these has its own pros and cons, but they all share one thing in common: they need curing agents to transform from soft, pliable films into durable, cross-linked networks.


🔬 The Role of Curing Agents

Curing agents are the catalysts that initiate the crosslinking reaction in encapsulant polymers. This reaction is what gives the encapsulant its structural integrity and long-term durability. Think of it like baking a cake — you mix the ingredients (the polymer), but it’s the oven (the curing agent and heat) that turns the batter into a solid, delicious final product.

There are several types of curing agents used in the solar industry:

  1. Peroxides
  2. Silane-based crosslinkers
  3. UV initiators
  4. Peroxide-free systems (e.g., organic titanates)

Each of these has different mechanisms, advantages, and drawbacks. Let’s explore them in more detail.


🧪 Peroxides: The Classic Crosslinkers

Peroxides have long been a go-to choice for crosslinking EVA and other polyolefin-based encapsulants. They work by decomposing under heat to generate free radicals, which then initiate the crosslinking of polymer chains.

✅ Advantages of Peroxides:

  • High crosslinking efficiency
  • Good thermal stability
  • Proven track record in industrial applications

❌ Disadvantages of Peroxides:

  • Can generate volatile byproducts
  • May cause yellowing or discoloration
  • Require precise control of curing temperature and time

🧪 Commonly Used Peroxides in Solar Encapsulation:

Peroxide Name Chemical Formula Decomposition Temp (°C) Typical Use Case
DCP (Dicumyl Peroxide) C₁₈H₂₂O₂ 160–170 EVA crosslinking
BPO (Benzoyl Peroxide) C₁₄H₁₀O₄ 80–90 Initiator for other reactions
TBPEH (Tert-Butyl Peroxybenzoate) C₁₃H₁₆O₃ 130–140 Controlled decomposition profiles

💡 Fun Fact: Peroxides aren’t just for solar panels — they’re also used in chewing gum to whiten teeth. But we don’t recommend using your solar encapsulant for oral hygiene.


🧬 Silane-Based Crosslinkers: The Green Alternative

Silane crosslinkers, particularly vinylsilanes, offer an alternative to peroxides by promoting moisture-assisted crosslinking. This method is often considered more environmentally friendly and results in fewer volatile byproducts.

✅ Advantages of Silane Crosslinkers:

  • Low VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) emissions
  • Better optical clarity
  • Improved resistance to hydrolysis

❌ Disadvantages of Silane Crosslinkers:

  • Slower crosslinking rate
  • Require post-curing in humid environments
  • Higher material cost

🧪 Common Silane Crosslinkers:

Silane Crosslinker Chemical Structure Curing Mechanism Typical Use Case
Vinyltrimethoxysilane CH₂=CHSi(OCH₃)₃ Moisture-induced hydrolysis EVA and PE encapsulants
γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane CH₂=C(CH₃)COO(CH₂)₃Si(OCH₃)₃ UV or thermal initiation UV-curable systems

☀️ UV Initiators: The Fast and the Furious

For certain types of encapsulants, especially UV-curable resins, UV initiators are the preferred curing agents. These compounds absorb UV light and generate free radicals or cations that trigger crosslinking.

✅ Advantages of UV Initiators:

  • Fast curing times
  • Low energy consumption
  • Suitable for thin-film applications

❌ Disadvantages of UV Initiators:

  • Limited penetration depth
  • Require transparent substrates
  • Sensitivity to oxygen inhibition

🧪 Common UV Initiators:

UV Initiator Type Activation Wavelength (nm) Typical Use Case
Irgacure 184 Radical initiator 240–320 EVA and acrylic systems
Irgacure 819 Radical initiator 300–400 Deep-penetration applications
UVI-6976 (Sulfonium) Cationic initiator 250–300 Epoxy-based systems

🧯 Peroxide-Free Systems: The New Kids on the Block

In recent years, peroxide-free curing systems have gained traction, especially in applications where VOC emissions and discoloration are concerns. These include organic titanates, zirconates, and metal-based catalysts.

✅ Advantages of Peroxide-Free Systems:

  • No volatile byproducts
  • Better color stability
  • Improved recyclability

❌ Disadvantages of Peroxide-Free Systems:

  • Less mature technology
  • Higher cost
  • Variable crosslinking efficiency

📊 Comparative Performance Analysis

Let’s put all these curing agents side by side in a performance matrix to see how they stack up.

Property Peroxides Silane Crosslinkers UV Initiators Peroxide-Free
Crosslinking Speed Fast Moderate Very Fast Moderate
Volatile Byproducts Yes Low None None
Optical Clarity Moderate High High High
Temperature Sensitivity High Low Moderate Low
Humidity Requirement Low High Low Low
Cost (per kg) Low Moderate High High
Yellowing Potential High Low Low Very Low
Shelf Life Moderate Long Short (UV-sensitive) Long
Environmental Friendliness Moderate High High High
Compatibility with EVA High High Moderate Moderate

🌍 Environmental and Safety Considerations

With the solar industry growing rapidly, the environmental footprint of materials used in production is under increasing scrutiny. Peroxides, while effective, can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during decomposition, which pose both environmental and occupational health risks.

In contrast, silane-based and peroxide-free systems are generally more eco-friendly, producing fewer harmful emissions and offering better recyclability.

Moreover, UV initiators, while energy-efficient, require careful handling due to their sensitivity to light and potential for skin irritation.


💰 Cost and Economic Viability

Cost is always a critical factor in any industrial process. Here’s a rough breakdown of the cost per kilogram of various curing agents (based on 2023 market data):

Curing Agent Type Approximate Cost (USD/kg) Notes
DCP (Dicumyl Peroxide) $10–15 Most widely used, cost-effective
Vinyltrimethoxysilane $20–30 Higher cost, but lower emissions
Irgacure 184 $30–50 High-performance UV initiator
Organic Titanate $40–60 Eco-friendly, emerging technology

While peroxides remain the most cost-effective option, the gap is narrowing as demand for greener alternatives grows and production scales up.


🧪 Real-World Performance and Case Studies

To understand how these curing agents perform in real-world applications, let’s take a look at a few case studies and literature reviews from recent years.

📚 Case Study 1: DCP in EVA Encapsulation (Zhang et al., 2021)

Zhang and colleagues studied the effect of DCP concentration on the crosslinking density and yellowing index of EVA films. They found that while increasing DCP content improved crosslinking, it also led to a significant increase in yellowing after 1,000 hours of UV exposure.

Conclusion: DCP is effective but requires careful dosage control to avoid discoloration.

📚 Case Study 2: Silane vs. Peroxide in POE Encapsulation (Lee et al., 2022)

Lee et al. compared silane-crosslinked POE with peroxide-crosslinked POE under accelerated aging conditions. The silane-crosslinked samples showed superior resistance to moisture and lower degradation rates after 2,000 hours of humidity testing.

Conclusion: Silane-based systems are more durable in humid environments.

📚 Case Study 3: UV-Curable Encapsulants for Thin-Film PV (Wang et al., 2023)

Wang and team developed a UV-curable encapsulant using Irgacure 819 as the initiator. The material achieved full cure within 10 minutes under industrial UV lamps, with excellent transparency and adhesion properties.

Conclusion: UV curing is a promising method for high-throughput production lines.


🧬 Future Trends and Innovations

As the demand for high-performance, eco-friendly encapsulants continues to grow, researchers are exploring new frontiers:

  • Hybrid curing systems that combine UV and thermal activation
  • Bio-based crosslinkers derived from renewable resources
  • Nanoparticle-enhanced encapsulants for improved thermal and mechanical properties

One particularly exciting development is the use of photoinitiators with visible light activation, which could reduce the need for UV lamps and lower energy consumption even further.


🧭 Conclusion: Choosing the Right Curing Agent

So, which curing agent is right for your solar encapsulation needs?

  • If you’re looking for cost-effectiveness and proven performance, peroxides are still a solid choice — especially for EVA-based systems.
  • If environmental impact and optical clarity are top priorities, consider silane crosslinkers or peroxide-free systems.
  • If speed and energy efficiency are key, UV initiators might be the way to go — particularly for thin-film and flexible PV applications.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific application, production setup, and long-term performance goals. As the solar industry continues to evolve, so too will the materials that power it — and the curing agents that hold them together.


📚 References

  1. Zhang, L., Liu, H., & Chen, Y. (2021). Effect of DCP Concentration on Crosslinking and Discoloration of EVA Encapsulant Films. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 223, 110945.
  2. Lee, K., Park, J., & Kim, S. (2022). Comparative Study of Silane and Peroxide Crosslinking in POE Encapsulants. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(12), 51872.
  3. Wang, X., Zhao, M., & Li, T. (2023). UV-Curable Encapsulants for Thin-Film Photovoltaics. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 31(4), 321–332.
  4. Gupta, A., & Singh, R. (2020). Eco-Friendly Crosslinking Agents for Solar Encapsulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132, 110034.
  5. Chen, Y., & Huang, W. (2022). Advances in Peroxide-Free Curing Systems for Polyolefins. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 195, 109782.

🙋‍♂️ Final Thoughts

Choosing the right curing agent for solar encapsulation isn’t just a matter of chemistry — it’s a balancing act between performance, cost, sustainability, and innovation. Whether you’re a manufacturer, researcher, or curious observer, understanding the role of peroxides and their alternatives is key to unlocking the full potential of solar technology.

So next time you look at a solar panel, remember — there’s a whole world of chemistry working behind the scenes to keep the sun shining bright.

☀️🔋🧬✨


Let me know if you’d like a version of this article formatted for a technical report, a blog post, or a presentation!

Sales Contact:sales@newtopchem.com

Prev:
Next: