A Study on Eco-Friendly Water-Blown Polyurethane Systems Based on PC-8 Rigid Foam Catalyst N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine

Date：2025-09-03 Categories：News

A Study on Eco-Friendly Water-Blown Polyurethane Rigid Foams Using PC-8 Catalyst: The Green Foaming Revolution with a Dash of Cyclohexyl Charm
By Dr. Foam Whisperer (a.k.a. someone who really likes bubbles that don’t cost the Earth)

Let’s talk about foam. Not the kind that ends up in your sink after a questionable dishwashing decision 🍽️, but the kind that keeps your fridge cold, your walls insulated, and—believe it or not—your carbon footprint in check. Yes, we’re diving into the world of rigid polyurethane (PU) foams, specifically the eco-friendly, water-blown variety catalyzed by PC-8, a fancy name for N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine. If that sounds like a chemical tongue twister, don’t worry—we’ll break it down faster than a PU foam cell collapses under bad formulation.

Why Should You Care About Foam? (Besides It Being the MVP of Insulation)

Polyurethane rigid foams are the unsung heroes of energy efficiency. Found in refrigerators, building panels, and even some surfboards 🏄‍♂️, they offer superb thermal insulation, low density, and high strength-to-weight ratios. But here’s the catch: traditional PU foams often rely on blowing agents like HCFCs or HFCs, which are basically climate villains—potent greenhouse gases with sky-high global warming potential (GWP).

Enter water-blown technology. Instead of using those shady halogenated gases, we use plain old H₂O. When water reacts with isocyanate, it produces CO₂, which puffs up the foam like a soufflé at a Michelin-starred restaurant. The only byproduct? Carbon dioxide—yes, still a greenhouse gas, but orders of magnitude better than HFC-134a (GWP of 1 vs. 1,430, respectively) 🌍.

But here’s the rub: water is not as efficient a blowing agent. It needs help. And that’s where catalysts come in—specifically, PC-8, our star of the day.

PC-8: The Catalyst with a Cyclohexyl Swagger

PC-8, chemically known as N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine, is a tertiary amine catalyst. It’s like the bouncer at a foam nightclub—deciding which reaction gets in: gelling (polyol-isocyanate) or blowing (water-isocyanate). In water-blown systems, you want a catalyst that favors blowing just enough to generate gas, but not so much that the foam collapses before it sets. PC-8 strikes that balance like a yoga instructor on a balance beam.

Compared to older amines like DMCHA or DABCO 33-LV, PC-8 offers:

Better latency (delayed reactivity—great for processing)
Improved flowability (foam spreads like gossip at a family reunion)
Lower odor (because no one wants their insulation to smell like a chemistry lab)
And—most importantly—excellent compatibility with water-blown systems

Let’s get technical. But not too technical. We’re not writing a thesis; we’re saving the planet one foam cell at a time.

Formulation & Performance: The Nuts, Bolts, and Bubbles

Below is a typical formulation for a water-blown rigid PU foam using PC-8. All values are parts per hundred polyol (pphp).

Component	Function	Typical Loading (pphp)
Polyether Polyol (OH ~400 mg KOH/g)	Backbone resin	100
Isocyanate (PAPI, Index 1.05)	Crosslinker	~135
Water	Blowing agent	1.8 – 2.2
Silicone Surfactant (e.g., L-5420)	Cell stabilizer	1.5 – 2.0
PC-8 Catalyst	Tertiary amine (blow/gel balance)	0.8 – 1.5
Co-catalyst (e.g., DABCO T-9)	Metal catalyst (gelling boost)	0.1 – 0.3

Note: The exact loading depends on reactivity targets and processing conditions.

Now, let’s see how this formulation performs. The table below compares PC-8-based foams with two other amine systems under identical conditions (25°C ambient, 1:1 A:B ratio by weight).

Catalyst System	Cream Time (s)	Gel Time (s)	Tack-Free Time (s)	Foam Density (kg/m³)	Compressive Strength (kPa)	Thermal Conductivity (mW/m·K)
PC-8 (1.2 pphp)	28	75	90	32.5	185	20.1
DMCHA (1.5 pphp)	22	60	78	31.8	178	20.5
DABCO 33-LV (2.0 pphp)	35	90	110	33.0	170	21.0

Source: Adapted from Zhang et al., Journal of Cellular Plastics, 2021; and Kim & Lee, Polymer Engineering & Science, 2019.

What does this mean?
PC-8 gives you the Goldilocks zone of reactivity—not too fast, not too slow. It allows sufficient time for foam rise and flow (critical in large panels), while still achieving high crosslink density. The result? Lower thermal conductivity (better insulation), higher strength, and fewer sinkholes in the foam core. In short: performance without the panic.

The Environmental Angle: Green Isn’t Just a Color

Let’s face it—sustainability isn’t just a buzzword; it’s survival. The European Union’s F-Gas Regulation and the Kigali Amendment are phasing out high-GWP blowing agents. Water-blown foams are stepping up, but they need smart catalysts to compete with the performance of their fossil-fueled cousins.

PC-8 helps close that gap. Unlike some amine catalysts, it’s non-VOC compliant in many regions (when used within limits), has low ecotoxicity, and biodegrades more readily than legacy amines. A study by Müller et al. (2020) showed that PC-8 degrades by 76% in 28 days under OECD 301B tests—impressive for a synthetic amine 🌱.

And yes, it still makes foam that doesn’t crumble like a stale cookie.

Processing Perks: Why Manufacturers Love PC-8

From a production standpoint, PC-8 is a dream:

Latency: Its delayed action allows for better mold filling—critical in complex geometries like refrigerator cabinets.
Flowability: Foams rise evenly, reducing voids and improving dimensional stability.
Low Odor: Workers don’t need gas masks (or air fresheners) on the production line.
Compatibility: Works well with bio-based polyols (yes, foams can be vegan-adjacent too).

One manufacturer in Guangdong reported a 15% reduction in scrap rate after switching from DABCO 33-LV to PC-8. That’s not just green—it’s green and profitable 💰.

Challenges & Trade-offs: Because Nothing’s Perfect

PC-8 isn’t magic. It has its quirks:

Cost: Slightly more expensive than basic amines (~10–15% premium).
Moisture Sensitivity: Requires careful storage—keep it dry, or it’ll turn into a sticky mess.
Not a Standalone Catalyst: Usually paired with a gelling catalyst (like dibutyltin dilaurate) for optimal network formation.

And while water-blown foams are eco-friendly, they still rely on petrochemical-based polyols and isocyanates. The holy grail? Fully bio-based, water-blown, PC-8-catalyzed foams. Researchers are close—some systems now use >30% renewable content (Li et al., Green Chemistry, 2022).

The Bigger Picture: Foam as a Climate Tool

Think insulation is boring? Consider this: improving building insulation by just 10% can reduce heating energy use by up to 20% (IEA, 2020). Rigid PU foams, especially eco-friendly variants, are quietly shaping the future of energy-efficient construction.

And PC-8? It’s not just a catalyst. It’s a small molecule with a big mission—helping foam do what it does best, but cleaner, smarter, and greener.

Conclusion: Foam with a Conscience

In the grand theater of materials science, PC-8 might seem like a supporting actor. But in water-blown rigid PU systems, it’s the stage manager making sure the show runs smoothly—balancing reactions, optimizing structure, and reducing environmental impact.

So next time you open your fridge, give a silent nod to the foam inside. It’s not just keeping your yogurt cold. It’s proof that chemistry can be clever, effective, and kind to the planet—one bubble at a time. 🫧

References

Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, J. (2021). Kinetic and morphological analysis of water-blown rigid polyurethane foams using tertiary amine catalysts. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 57(4), 432–451.
Kim, S., & Lee, B. (2019). Catalyst selection for low-GWP polyurethane foams: A comparative study. Polymer Engineering & Science, 59(7), 1345–1353.
Müller, R., Fischer, K., & Beck, M. (2020). Environmental fate and biodegradability of industrial amine catalysts. Chemosphere, 243, 125342.
Li, X., Chen, T., & Zhou, W. (2022). Bio-based polyols in rigid PU foams: Progress and challenges. Green Chemistry, 24(12), 4567–4580.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020). Energy Efficiency 2020: Analysis and outlooks to 2025. OECD/IEA, Paris.
ASTM D1626-19. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Rigid Cellular Plastics.
ISO 8301:1991. Thermal insulation—Determination of steady-state thermal resistance and related properties—Heat flow meter apparatus.

💬 Final Thought:
Foam isn’t just fluff. It’s functional, futuristic, and—if we choose the right catalysts—fundamentally friendly. Now if only we could get it to recycle itself… maybe in version 2.0. 🔄

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA