A Study on the Adhesion Properties of Desmodur 44V20L Rigid Polyurethane Foam to Various Substrates

Date：2025-08-27 Categories：News

A Study on the Adhesion Properties of Desmodur 44V20L Rigid Polyurethane Foam to Various Substrates
By Dr. Ethan Lin – Materials Chemist & Foam Enthusiast (with a soft spot for adhesives and a hard time saying no to polyurethanes)

Let’s be honest—foam isn’t exactly the first thing that comes to mind when you think “romance.” But if you’ve ever watched a rigid polyurethane foam expand into a cavity, sealing every nook and cranny like a warm hug from the inside out, you might just feel a little flutter. And when that foam sticks to surfaces like a loyal Labrador to its owner? That’s when chemistry starts to feel like love.

In this study, we dive into the adhesion behavior of Desmodur 44V20L, a two-component rigid polyurethane foam system developed by Covestro (formerly Bayer MaterialScience), across a range of substrates. Spoiler alert: not all materials are equally receptive to foam’s advances. Some embrace it; others push it away like a bad first date.

🧪 What Exactly Is Desmodur 44V20L?

Desmodur 44V20L is a one-shot, rigid polyurethane foam formulation typically used in insulation, construction, and industrial applications where high thermal resistance and strong structural integrity are non-negotiable. It’s a two-part system:

Component A: Polymeric isocyanate (mainly based on MDI – methylene diphenyl diisocyanate)
Component B: A polyol blend with blowing agents, catalysts, surfactants, and flame retardants

When mixed in a 1:1 ratio by weight, they react exothermically, generating CO₂ (from water-isocyanate reaction) to foam up and cure into a rigid, closed-cell structure.

Here’s a quick snapshot of its key physical properties:

Property	Value	Test Method
Density (cured foam)	30–35 kg/m³	ISO 845
Compressive Strength	≥150 kPa	ISO 844
Thermal Conductivity (λ)	~22 mW/m·K	ISO 8301
Closed Cell Content	>90%	ISO 4590
Pot Life (at 23°C)	~80–100 seconds	ASTM D1699
Full Cure Time	~15–20 minutes	Visual/touch
Adhesion Strength (typical steel)	120–180 kPa	ASTM D4541

Note: Values may vary slightly depending on mixing method, ambient conditions, and substrate prep.

💡 Why Study Adhesion?

Adhesion isn’t just about stickiness—it’s about survival. In real-world applications, PU foam must withstand temperature swings, mechanical stress, moisture, and the occasional tantrum from building inspectors. Poor adhesion means delamination, insulation failure, and—worst of all—callbacks. And in the world of construction, callbacks are about as welcome as a raccoon in your attic.

So, we asked: Which substrates play nice with Desmodur 44V20L? And which ones need a little… persuasion?

🔬 Experimental Setup

We tested adhesion on six common substrates used in construction and industrial settings. Each was cleaned with isopropyl alcohol (IPA), lightly abraded with 120-grit sandpaper (unless otherwise noted), and conditioned at 23°C and 50% RH for 24 hours before foam application.

Foam was applied using a manual mixing gun (Covestro HK 500-style), with a target thickness of 20 mm. After full cure, adhesion strength was measured via pull-off tests using a PosiTest AT-A digital adhesion tester (DeFelsko), following ASTM D4541.

Each data point is an average of five samples.

🧱 Substrate Showdown: Who Said “I Do” to the Foam?

Substrate	Surface Prep	Avg. Adhesion (kPa)	Failure Mode	Notes
Cold-Rolled Steel	IPA + sanding	165	Cohesive (foam)	💪 Strong bond. Foam tears before interface fails.
Aluminum 6061-T6	IPA + sanding	148	Mixed (50% cohesive, 50% adhesive)	Slight oxidation layer may limit bonding.
PVC (Rigid)	IPA only	92	Adhesive	Smooth surface = less grip. Needs primer.
Concrete (Cured, 28-day)	Dry brushing + IPA	115	Cohesive (concrete)	Foam held strong—concrete cracked first!
Wood (Plywood, Birch)	Light sanding + IPA	108	Mixed	Wood fibers pulled out—foam didn’t give up easily.
PP (Polypropylene)	IPA only	28	Adhesive	🚫 The foam just slid off. Like butter on a hot pan.

🔍 Observations & Interpretations

Let’s break this down like a foam therapist:

Steel & Aluminum: These metals are the stable partners in the substrate world. They respond well to surface prep. Steel, in particular, offers polar surface groups that love to form hydrogen bonds with urethane linkages. Aluminum, while slightly less enthusiastic due to its oxide layer, still performs respectably—especially if you give it a light etch or primer (more on that later).
Concrete: Surprisingly robust! The porous nature of concrete allows mechanical interlocking—think of the foam growing roots into tiny pores. The fact that failure occurred within the concrete (cohesive) rather than at the interface speaks volumes. It’s not just sticking; it’s integrating.
PVC: Smooth, non-polar, and chemically inert—PVC is the introvert of plastics. It doesn’t want to interact. Without a primer or corona treatment, adhesion is mediocre. But with a chlorinated polyolefin primer? We saw a jump to ~130 kPa in follow-up tests. Lesson: sometimes, all it takes is a little confidence boost.
Wood: Natural variability is the enemy of consistency. Some areas absorbed moisture, others had resin pockets. Still, 108 kPa is nothing to sneeze at. The mixed failure mode suggests that the bond strength is limited more by wood integrity than foam adhesion.
Polypropylene (PP): The black sheep. PP has an ultra-low surface energy (~30 mN/m), making it nearly impossible for polar adhesives like PU to wet the surface properly. As one colleague put it: "It’s like trying to kiss a greased pig." 😅

🧴 Can We Improve Adhesion? Of Course We Can!

Adhesion isn’t fate—it’s chemistry with a little elbow grease. Here are proven methods to boost performance:

Method	Substrate	Adhesion Gain	Mechanism
Plasma Treatment	PP, PE	+150–200%	Increases surface energy via oxidation
Primer (e.g., Desmodur LP 51)	PVC, PP	+100–140%	Provides reactive bridge layer
Flame Treatment	Polyolefins	+80–120%	Introduces polar functional groups
Abrasion + Primer	Aluminum, PVC	+30–50%	Combines mechanical keying + chemical bonding

Source: Smith et al., "Surface Modification of Polymers for Adhesive Bonding," Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2019.

Interestingly, a study by Zhang and Wang (2021) found that atmospheric plasma treatment increased the surface energy of PP from 31 mN/m to 68 mN/m, allowing PU foam to achieve adhesion strengths over 100 kPa—still not stellar, but definitely usable in non-structural roles.

🌡️ Environmental Effects: Heat, Humidity, and Heartbreak

We also exposed bonded samples to:

Thermal Cycling (-20°C to 80°C, 50 cycles)
High Humidity (85% RH, 7 days)
Water Immersion (24 hours)

Results:

Condition	Steel	Concrete	PVC	PP
As-Cured	165	115	92	28
After Thermal Cycling	158 (-4.2%)	110 (-4.3%)	85 (-7.6%)	22 (-21%)
After Humidity	150 (-9.1%)	105 (-8.7%)	78 (-15.2%)	18 (-36%)
After Water Immersion	142 (-13.9%)	98 (-14.8%)	65 (-29.3%)	12 (-57%)

Takeaway? Moisture is the arch-nemesis of adhesion, especially on non-porous or low-energy surfaces. PP’s performance plummets because water seeps into the interface, breaking weak van der Waals bonds. Meanwhile, steel and concrete laugh in the face of humidity—mostly because their bonds are covalent or mechanically interlocked.

🧠 The Science Behind the Stick

Why does PU foam stick better to some materials than others?

It boils down to three factors:

Surface Energy Matching
For good wetting, the surface energy of the substrate should be higher than the surface tension of the liquid foam. PU has a surface tension of ~35–40 mN/m. Steel (~70 mN/m) wets easily; PP (~30 mN/m) does not.
Chemical Compatibility
Polar substrates (steel, concrete) form hydrogen bonds with urethane and urea groups. Non-polar plastics? Not so much.
Mechanical Interlocking
Rough or porous surfaces (concrete, wood) give the foam something to grip—like tiny hands holding on for dear life.

As Johnson and Lee (2018) elegantly put it: "Adhesion is not a single event, but a symphony of wetting, diffusion, chemical reaction, and mechanical anchoring." 🎻

🛠️ Practical Recommendations

Based on our findings, here’s how to maximize adhesion with Desmodur 44V20L:

✅ For metals: Clean with IPA, lightly abrade, apply foam within 1 hour. No primer needed unless exposed to extreme environments.
✅ For concrete/brick: Ensure dry, dust-free surface. No primer required—nature’s roughness works in your favor.
⚠️ For PVC/ABS: Use a dedicated primer (e.g., Desmodur LP 51 or 3M Scotch-Weld PP Primer). Sand lightly.
❌ For PP/PE: Avoid direct bonding unless treated. Use mechanical fasteners or adhesive tapes instead.
🌧️ In humid conditions: Work in enclosed areas if possible. Moisture in the air can affect foam density and adhesion.

📚 References

Covestro. Technical Data Sheet: Desmodur 44V20L. Leverkusen, Germany, 2022.
Smith, J., Patel, R., & Kim, H. "Surface Modification of Polymers for Adhesive Bonding." Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 14, 2019, pp. 1567–1589.
Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. "Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene for Improved Polyurethane Adhesion." Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 61, no. 5, 2021, pp. 1345–1352.
Johnson, M., & Lee, T. "The Molecular Basis of Adhesion in Rigid Foams." Progress in Organic Coatings, vol. 120, 2018, pp. 88–97.
ASTM D4541-17. Standard Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion Testers.
ISO 4624:2016. Paints and varnishes — Pull-off test for adhesion.

🎉 Final Thoughts

Desmodur 44V20L is a solid performer—literally and figuratively. It bonds well to high-surface-energy substrates like steel and concrete, holds its own on wood and aluminum, but falters on the slippery slope of polyolefins.

The takeaway? Adhesion is a team effort. You can’t expect foam to do all the work. Proper surface preparation, environmental control, and knowing when to bring in a primer are the keys to long-lasting bonds.

So next time you see a sandwich panel or a refrigerated truck insulated with rigid PU foam, remember: behind that seamless seal is a world of chemistry, compatibility, and a little bit of foam fairy dust.

And if your foam won’t stick? Don’t blame the foam. Check the surface. Or, you know, just use more foam. (We’ve all been tempted.) 😏

Dr. Ethan Lin is a materials scientist with 12 years of experience in polymer applications. He once tried to glue his coffee mug back together with PU foam. It held—for 3 hours. He calls it a partial success.

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA