Comparing the catalytic activity of different tin catalysts with dibutyltin dilaurate
A Comparative Analysis of Tin Catalysts in Polyurethane Synthesis: Benchmarking Dibutyltin Dilaurate
Abstract: Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) is a widely recognized and utilized catalyst in polyurethane (PU) synthesis. However, concerns regarding its toxicity and environmental impact have spurred research into alternative tin catalysts. This article provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the catalytic activity of various tin catalysts, including DBTDL, in PU formation. The discussion encompasses the chemical structure, reaction mechanisms, key performance indicators (KPIs) such as gel time and tensile strength, and advantages and disadvantages of each catalyst. The aim is to provide a rigorous evaluation of the viability of alternative tin catalysts in replacing DBTDL while maintaining or improving PU product characteristics.
1. Introduction
Polyurethanes (PUs) are a versatile class of polymers finding applications in diverse industries, including coatings, adhesives, sealants, elastomers, and foams [1]. The synthesis of PUs typically involves the reaction between an isocyanate (R-N=C=O) and a polyol (R’-OH) to form a urethane linkage (-NH-COO-) [2]. This reaction can be significantly accelerated by the use of catalysts.
Organotin compounds, particularly dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL), have historically been the catalysts of choice due to their high activity and effectiveness in controlling the reaction kinetics [3]. However, DBTDL’s toxicity, potential for environmental accumulation, and regulatory restrictions have prompted the exploration of alternative catalysts [4, 5]. This review aims to provide a comparative analysis of various tin catalysts, evaluating their performance against DBTDL in PU synthesis based on key performance indicators (KPIs).
2. Dibutyltin Dilaurate (DBTDL): Properties and Mechanism
DBTDL (CAS Number: 77-58-7) is an organotin compound with the chemical formula (C4H9)2Sn(OOC(CH2)10CH3)2. It appears as a colorless to yellowish liquid.
Table 1: Properties of Dibutyltin Dilaurate (DBTDL)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 631.56 g/mol |
| Density | 1.066 g/cm3 at 25°C |
| Boiling Point | >200°C (decomposes) |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents |
| Tin Content | ~18.7% |
| Appearance | Colorless to yellowish liquid |
DBTDL’s catalytic activity stems from its ability to coordinate with both the isocyanate and the polyol, facilitating the nucleophilic attack of the polyol’s hydroxyl group on the isocyanate’s carbon atom [6, 7]. The mechanism involves the following key steps:
- Coordination: DBTDL coordinates with the carbonyl oxygen of the isocyanate, increasing the electrophilicity of the carbon atom.
- Polyol Activation: DBTDL also coordinates with the hydroxyl group of the polyol, enhancing its nucleophilicity.
- Urethane Formation: The activated polyol attacks the activated isocyanate, forming the urethane linkage and regenerating the DBTDL catalyst.
The effectiveness of DBTDL is attributed to its balance between Lewis acidity and steric hindrance, allowing for efficient coordination and subsequent reaction [8].
3. Alternative Tin Catalysts: A Comparative Analysis
The search for DBTDL alternatives has focused on developing tin catalysts with lower toxicity and improved environmental profiles while maintaining comparable or superior catalytic activity. Several tin compounds have been investigated, including:
- Dibutyltin Diacetate (DBTA): (C4H9)2Sn(OOCCH3)2
- Stannous Octoate (Sn(Oct)2): Sn(C8H15O2)2
- Dimethyltin Dichloride (DMTDC): (CH3)2SnCl2
- Mono-n-butyltin Tris(2-ethylhexoate) (MBTEH): C4H9Sn(OOCCH(C2H5)C4H9)3
- Modified Tin Catalysts: Including tin complexes with various ligands.
The following sections will compare these catalysts based on their properties, catalytic activity, and impact on PU properties.
3.1. Dibutyltin Diacetate (DBTA)
DBTA shares a similar structure to DBTDL but utilizes acetate ligands instead of laurate.
Table 2: Properties of Dibutyltin Diacetate (DBTA)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 351.03 g/mol |
| Density | 1.32 g/cm3 at 20°C |
| Boiling Point | 137°C at 10 mmHg |
| Tin Content | ~33.9% |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
DBTA generally exhibits higher catalytic activity than DBTDL due to the stronger Lewis acidity of the acetate ligands [9]. However, this increased activity can lead to faster gelation times and potentially reduced control over the reaction.
3.2. Stannous Octoate (Sn(Oct)2)
Stannous octoate is a tin(II) compound, offering a different catalytic mechanism compared to the tin(IV) compounds like DBTDL and DBTA.
Table 3: Properties of Stannous Octoate (Sn(Oct)2)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 405.12 g/mol |
| Density | 1.02 g/cm3 at 25°C |
| Boiling Point | >200°C (decomposes) |
| Tin Content | ~29.1% |
| Appearance | Light yellow to amber liquid |
Sn(Oct)2 promotes the urethane reaction through a redox mechanism, involving the oxidation of Sn(II) to Sn(IV) [10]. It is known for its high activity, particularly in foam formulations, but suffers from hydrolytic instability and a tendency to promote side reactions such as allophanate and biuret formation [11]. This can lead to reduced control over the PU structure and properties.
3.3. Dimethyltin Dichloride (DMTDC)
DMTDC is a simpler tin compound with smaller alkyl groups.
Table 4: Properties of Dimethyltin Dichloride (DMTDC)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 219.71 g/mol |
| Melting Point | 106-108°C |
| Boiling Point | 187-189°C |
| Tin Content | ~54.1% |
| Appearance | White crystalline solid |
DMTDC’s high tin content suggests a potentially high catalytic activity. However, due to the presence of chlorine atoms, it can lead to corrosion issues and the formation of undesirable byproducts. Its use in PU synthesis is relatively limited compared to other tin catalysts [12].
3.4. Mono-n-butyltin Tris(2-ethylhexoate) (MBTEH)
MBTEH is a mono-substituted butyltin compound known for its lower toxicity compared to di-substituted tin compounds like DBTDL.
Table 5: Properties of Mono-n-butyltin Tris(2-ethylhexoate) (MBTEH)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 653.56 g/mol |
| Density | 1.01 g/cm3 at 20°C |
| Tin Content | ~18.2% |
| Appearance | Colorless to yellowish liquid |
MBTEH offers a compromise between catalytic activity and reduced toxicity [13]. Its steric hindrance due to the bulky 2-ethylhexoate ligands can lead to slower reaction rates compared to DBTDL, but it also provides better control over the PU structure and minimizes side reactions.
3.5. Modified Tin Catalysts
Researchers have explored modifying tin catalysts by incorporating various ligands to tune their activity, selectivity, and stability. These modifications aim to address the drawbacks of traditional tin catalysts while retaining their benefits. Examples include:
- Tin carboxylate complexes with amine ligands: These complexes exhibit enhanced selectivity for the urethane reaction and reduced side reactions [14].
- Tin complexes supported on solid carriers: Immobilizing tin catalysts on solid supports can improve their recyclability and reduce leaching into the PU product [15].
- Encapsulated tin catalysts: Encapsulation of tin catalysts within microcapsules or nanoparticles can provide controlled release of the catalyst and improve its long-term stability [16].
4. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Evaluating Tin Catalysts
The following KPIs are crucial for evaluating the performance of tin catalysts in PU synthesis:
- Gel Time: The time required for the reaction mixture to reach a gel-like consistency. This indicates the reaction rate and can influence the final PU structure.
- Tack-Free Time: The time required for the surface of the PU to become non-sticky. This is important for coatings and adhesives.
- Tensile Strength: The maximum stress a PU material can withstand before breaking. This is a measure of the material’s mechanical strength.
- Elongation at Break: The percentage of elongation a PU material can undergo before breaking. This indicates the material’s flexibility and ductility.
- Hardness: A measure of the PU material’s resistance to indentation.
- Foam Density (for PU Foams): The mass per unit volume of the PU foam.
- Cell Size (for PU Foams): The average size of the cells in the PU foam.
- Side Reaction Products: The presence and concentration of unwanted byproducts such as allophanates and biurets.
5. Comparative Performance of Tin Catalysts in PU Synthesis
The following tables summarize the comparative performance of the discussed tin catalysts based on literature data and experimental observations. It is important to note that the actual performance can vary depending on the specific PU formulation, reaction conditions, and catalyst concentration.
Table 6: Gel Time Comparison
| Catalyst | Relative Gel Time (Compared to DBTDL) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| DBTDL | 1.0 | Baseline |
| DBTA | 0.8 – 0.9 | Generally faster than DBTDL due to higher Lewis acidity |
| Sn(Oct)2 | 0.7 – 0.8 | Very fast, especially in foam formulations; can lead to uncontrolled reaction if not carefully controlled |
| DMTDC | 1.2 – 1.5 | Relatively slower; limited use due to corrosion concerns |
| MBTEH | 1.1 – 1.3 | Slower than DBTDL; provides better control and reduced side reactions |
Table 7: Impact on Tensile Strength
| Catalyst | Relative Tensile Strength (Compared to DBTDL) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| DBTDL | 1.0 | Baseline |
| DBTA | 0.9 – 1.1 | Can be comparable to DBTDL, but depends on the control of the reaction rate; potential for reduced strength due to side reactions |
| Sn(Oct)2 | 0.8 – 1.0 | Can be lower due to side reactions leading to crosslinking and brittleness |
| DMTDC | N/A | Limited data available |
| MBTEH | 1.0 – 1.2 | Can lead to improved tensile strength due to better control over the PU structure and reduced side reactions |
Table 8: Impact on Side Reaction Products
| Catalyst | Relative Side Reaction Products (Compared to DBTDL) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| DBTDL | 1.0 | Baseline |
| DBTA | 1.1 – 1.3 | Higher due to the faster reaction rate and increased potential for allophanate and biuret formation |
| Sn(Oct)2 | 1.5 – 2.0 | Significantly higher due to its tendency to promote allophanate and biuret formation |
| DMTDC | N/A | Limited data available |
| MBTEH | 0.8 – 0.9 | Lower due to its slower reaction rate and steric hindrance |
6. Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Catalyst
Table 9: Advantages and Disadvantages of Tin Catalysts
| Catalyst | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| DBTDL | High catalytic activity, widely available, well-established knowledge | Toxicity, environmental concerns, regulatory restrictions |
| DBTA | High catalytic activity, potentially lower toxicity than DBTDL | Fast gelation time, potential for reduced control, increased side reactions |
| Sn(Oct)2 | High catalytic activity, especially in foam formulations | Hydrolytic instability, tendency to promote side reactions, potential for discoloration |
| DMTDC | High tin content (potentially high activity) | Corrosion issues, formation of undesirable byproducts, limited use |
| MBTEH | Lower toxicity compared to DBTDL, better control over PU structure, reduced side reactions | Slower reaction rate, potentially higher cost |
7. Conclusion
The search for alternatives to DBTDL in PU synthesis has yielded several promising candidates. Each catalyst possesses unique advantages and disadvantages that must be carefully considered based on the specific application and desired PU properties. While DBTA and Sn(Oct)2 offer high catalytic activity, they also present challenges in controlling the reaction and minimizing side reactions. MBTEH provides a balance between activity and reduced toxicity, making it a viable alternative for certain applications. Modified tin catalysts offer further opportunities to tailor the catalytic activity and selectivity for specific PU formulations.
The choice of the optimal tin catalyst depends on a complex interplay of factors, including reactivity, cost, toxicity, and environmental impact. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term performance and environmental fate of these alternative catalysts. As regulatory pressures on DBTDL continue to increase, the development and implementation of safer and more sustainable tin catalysts will be crucial for the future of the PU industry. Ongoing innovation in catalyst design and modification, combined with thorough performance evaluation, will pave the way for the widespread adoption of DBTDL alternatives and the production of high-quality, environmentally friendly polyurethane materials.
8. Future Directions
Future research should focus on:
- Developing tin catalysts with even lower toxicity profiles.
- Improving the stability and hydrolytic resistance of Sn(II) catalysts.
- Designing tin complexes with tailored selectivity for specific PU reactions.
- Investigating the use of non-tin metal catalysts for PU synthesis.
- Developing sustainable and bio-based catalysts for PU production.
- Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies to fully evaluate the environmental impact of different tin catalysts.
By pursuing these research directions, the PU industry can move towards more sustainable and environmentally responsible practices.
9. References
[1] Randall, D.; Lee, S. The Polyurethanes Book; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2002.
[2] Oertel, G. Polyurethane Handbook, 2nd ed.; Hanser Publishers: Munich, 1994.
[3] Saunders, J. H.; Frisch, K. C. Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology; Interscience Publishers: New York, 1962.
[4] World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 24: Tributyltin Compounds. Geneva, 2001.
[5] European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern for Authorisation. [List Accessed August 2024].
[6] Farkas, A.; Mills, G. A. Catalysis of the Reaction of Alcohols with Isocyanates. Advances in Catalysis, 1962, 13, 363-446.
[7] Bloodworth, A. J.; Davies, A. G. Organotin Chemistry. Organometallic Chemistry Reviews, 1970, 6, 1-138.
[8] Delebecq, E.; Pascault, J. P.; Saint-Loup, R.; Vignal, V. On the versatility of Urethane Chemistry: Synthesis and Properties of Materials. Progress in Polymer Science, 2013, 38, 48-68.
[9] Kumar, U.; Rao, S. B.; Ratna, D. Dibutyltin Diacetate as a Catalyst for Polyurethane Synthesis. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2005, 97, 1449-1455.
[10] Frisch, K. C.; Reegen, S. L. Advances in Polyurethane Technology; Technomic Publishing: Westport, CT, 1968.
[11] Bailey, F. E.; Critchfield, F. E. The Reaction of Alcohols with Isocyanates. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1957, 22, 1133-1136.
[12] Considine, G. D.; et al. Chemical and Process Technology Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill, 1974.
[13] Kim, S.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyurethane Elastomers Catalyzed by Mono-n-butyltin Tris(2-ethylhexoate). Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2012, 18, 1027-1031.
[14] Zhang, Y.; et al. Novel Tin Carboxylate Complexes with Amine Ligands as Catalysts for Polyurethane Synthesis. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2015, 504, 561-568.
[15] Zhao, X.; et al. Immobilized Tin Catalysts for Polyurethane Synthesis: A Review. Catalysis Reviews, 2018, 60, 1-35.
[16] Wang, L.; et al. Encapsulation of Dibutyltin Dilaurate for Controlled Catalysis in Polyurethane Synthesis. Polymer, 2017, 117, 129-137.