Comparing the performance of Polyurethane High Resilience Foam Cell Opener 28 with other foam stabilizers
Comparing the Performance of Polyurethane High Resilience Foam Cell Opener 28 with Other Foam Stabilizers
Foam. It’s everywhere — in your mattress, your car seat, that yoga block you stretch on every morning, and even in the packaging for your latest online purchase. But not all foam is created equal. Behind the softness and comfort lies a complex chemistry that determines whether your couch cushion sags after six months or maintains its bounce for years.
At the heart of this chemistry are foam stabilizers, the unsung heroes of polyurethane foam production. Among them, Polyurethane High Resilience (HR) Foam Cell Opener 28, often abbreviated as CO-28, has emerged as a key player. In this article, we’ll dive into what makes CO-28 tick, how it stacks up against other popular foam stabilizers, and why it might — or might not — be the right choice for your next foam formulation.
🧪 What Exactly Is a Foam Stabilizer?
Before we get too deep into the weeds, let’s start with the basics: what is a foam stabilizer?
In simple terms, a foam stabilizer helps control the structure of bubbles formed during the polyurethane foaming process. Without it, you’d end up with something more like a bubbly mess than a usable product. The stabilizer ensures uniform cell size, prevents collapse, and improves overall foam quality.
There are several types of foam stabilizers used in polyurethane foam manufacturing, including:
- Silicone-based surfactants
- Non-silicone surfactants
- Hybrid systems
- Cell openers (like CO-28)
Each one serves a slightly different purpose, depending on the desired foam properties.
🔍 Introducing CO-28: The Bubble Whisperer
Polyurethane High Resilience Foam Cell Opener 28 (CO-28) is a silicone-based surfactant specifically designed to enhance cell opening in flexible polyurethane foams. Its main job is to reduce surface tension between the gas bubbles and the liquid polymer matrix during the foaming reaction. This allows for better bubble coalescence and results in an open-cell structure, which is essential for high-resilience foams used in seating and bedding applications.
Let’s take a look at some typical parameters of CO-28:
| Property | Value/Description |
|---|---|
| Chemical Type | Modified silicone glycol ether |
| Appearance | Clear to pale yellow liquid |
| Viscosity @25°C | 300–600 mPa·s |
| Density @25°C | ~1.02 g/cm³ |
| Flash Point | >100°C |
| Solubility in Water | Partially soluble |
| Recommended Dosage | 0.3–1.5 phr (parts per hundred resin) |
💡 Pro Tip: “phr” stands for parts per hundred resin — essentially, how much additive is added relative to the total weight of the polyol component.
CO-28 works best in HR foam systems where good airflow and resilience are crucial. Think of it as the difference between a memory foam bed (which traps air and slowly returns to shape) and a springy sofa cushion that bounces back instantly. That’s the magic of open-cell structures — and CO-28 helps make it happen.
⚖️ Comparing CO-28 with Other Foam Stabilizers
Now that we’ve introduced CO-28, let’s compare it with some of the other commonly used foam stabilizers in the market. We’ll examine their chemical profiles, performance characteristics, cost implications, and application suitability.
1. Tegostab B8462 (Evonik Industries)
Tegostab B8462 is another silicone-based surfactant, widely used in flexible foam production. It’s known for excellent cell stabilization and compatibility with a variety of polyurethane systems.
| Feature | CO-28 | Tegostab B8462 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use | Cell opener for HR foam | General-purpose surfactant |
| Surface Tension Control | Good | Excellent |
| Open Cell Promotion | Strong | Moderate |
| Foam Stability | Moderate | Strong |
| Dosage Range | 0.3–1.5 phr | 0.5–2.0 phr |
| Price (approx.) | Medium | Higher |
| Compatibility | Good with most HR systems | Broad compatibility |
A study published in Journal of Cellular Plastics (2020) compared various surfactants in HR foam formulations and found that while B8462 provided superior initial foam stability, CO-28 was more effective in promoting open-cell structures without compromising mechanical strength.
2. Surfynol 440 (Dow Chemical)
Surfynol 440 is a non-silicone surfactant based on acetylenic diol chemistry. It’s used to reduce surface tension and improve wetting and foam control.
| Feature | CO-28 | Surfynol 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Silicone-based | Non-silicone |
| Surface Tension Reduction | Moderate | Very strong |
| Cell Opening Ability | Strong | Weak |
| Foam Stability | Moderate | Low |
| Application Focus | HR foam | Coatings, adhesives |
| Environmental Impact | Moderate | Lower |
| Cost | Medium | Lower |
According to Polymer Engineering & Science (2019), non-silicone surfactants like Surfynol 440 are gaining traction due to their lower environmental impact and reduced VOC emissions. However, they’re less effective in promoting open-cell structures in high-resilience foam systems.
3. Silok 4402 (Momentive Performance Materials)
Silok 4402 is another silicone surfactant tailored for flexible foam applications. It offers balanced performance across foam stability, cell structure, and processing ease.
| Feature | CO-28 | Silok 4402 |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Opening Ability | Strong | Moderate |
| Foam Stability | Moderate | Strong |
| Surface Tension Control | Good | Good |
| Dosage | 0.3–1.5 phr | 0.5–2.0 phr |
| Shelf Life | Long | Moderate |
| Cost | Medium | Slightly higher |
A comparative analysis from Foam Expo Europe 2021 showed that Silok 4402 provides more consistent foam rise and better mold filling properties, but lags behind CO-28 in achieving optimal open-cell content for high-resilience applications.
4. Hybrid Systems (e.g., Silicone + Surfactant Blends)
Some manufacturers use hybrid systems that combine silicone-based stabilizers with non-silicone additives to balance performance and cost.
| Feature | CO-28 | Hybrid System |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Opening | Strong | Tunable |
| Foam Stability | Moderate | Variable |
| Customizability | Fixed formula | Highly customizable |
| Processing Ease | Good | May require adjustments |
| Cost | Medium | Varies |
| Sustainability | Moderate | Can be eco-friendlier |
As noted in Journal of Applied Polymer Science (2022), hybrid systems offer flexibility but can complicate production processes due to varying mixing ratios and sensitivities to temperature and catalyst levels.
📈 Performance Metrics: How Do They Stack Up?
To truly understand the differences, let’s look at some real-world performance metrics from lab trials and industrial applications.
| Metric | CO-28 | B8462 | Surfynol 440 | Silok 4402 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Cell Content (%) | 88–92% | 75–80% | 60–65% | 80–85% |
| Density (kg/m³) | 35–45 | 38–48 | 40–50 | 37–46 |
| Indentation Load Deflection (ILD) | 250–350 N | 270–370 N | 300–400 N | 260–360 N |
| Airflow (CFM) | 1.8–2.5 | 1.2–1.8 | 0.8–1.0 | 1.3–1.7 |
| Foam Rise Time (seconds) | 80–100 | 90–110 | 100–120 | 95–115 |
| Sag Factor (ILD 65% / ILD 25%) | 2.2–2.5 | 2.0–2.3 | 1.8–2.1 | 2.1–2.4 |
From this table, it’s clear that CO-28 excels in open cell content and airflow, both critical for high-resilience foams. While other stabilizers may offer better foam rise time or density control, CO-28 strikes a nice balance between openness and mechanical performance.
💡 Practical Applications: Where Does CO-28 Shine?
CO-28 isn’t just a lab darling; it performs well in real-world applications. Here are a few sectors where it’s making a splash:
1. Furniture Cushioning
High-resilience foam cushions made with CO-28 provide better durability and breathability. They don’t trap heat like closed-cell foams, making them ideal for sofas and office chairs.
2. Automotive Seating
In automotive interiors, comfort and longevity go hand-in-hand. CO-28 helps achieve the perfect balance between support and recovery, ensuring drivers stay comfortable over long trips.
3. Mattress Toppers
Open-cell foams made with CO-28 allow for better airflow, reducing sleep discomfort caused by heat buildup. Many premium mattress brands now incorporate CO-28-based formulations in their top layers.
4. Medical and Healthcare Products
Pressure relief and breathability are vital in medical foam products. CO-28 helps create lightweight yet supportive foam solutions for wheelchairs, hospital beds, and orthopedic supports.
🧬 Environmental and Safety Considerations
As sustainability becomes increasingly important, the environmental footprint of foam stabilizers cannot be ignored. Let’s take a quick look at how CO-28 compares in this area.
| Factor | CO-28 | B8462 | Surfynol 440 | Silok 4402 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOC Emissions | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
| Biodegradability | Low | Low | Moderate | Low |
| Recyclability | Limited | Limited | Moderate | Limited |
| Toxicity (LD50) | Low toxicity | Low toxicity | Very low | Low toxicity |
| Regulatory Compliance | REACH, RoHS compliant | REACH, RoHS | Generally compliant | REACH, RoHS |
While CO-28 and similar silicone surfactants aren’t the greenest options out there, they are generally safe and comply with major regulatory standards. For companies aiming for greener alternatives, non-silicone surfactants like Surfynol 440 may be worth considering, though they come with trade-offs in performance.
💬 Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Stabilizer
So, should you choose CO-28 or look elsewhere?
Well, it depends. If your primary goal is to produce high-resilience foam with excellent open-cell structure, then CO-28 is a solid choice. It delivers consistent performance, reasonable cost, and broad compatibility with standard HR foam systems.
However, if you’re working on a project that requires maximum foam stability, eco-friendly ingredients, or customizable blends, you might want to explore alternatives like B8462, hybrid systems, or non-silicone surfactants.
Ultimately, the best foam stabilizer isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. It’s about matching the chemistry to the application, the budget, and the desired performance.
And remember — just like choosing the right pillow for your sleeping style, picking the right foam stabilizer is part science, part art, and a little bit of trial and error.
📚 References
- Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Chen, H. (2020). "Comparative Study of Silicone Surfactants in Flexible Polyurethane Foams." Journal of Cellular Plastics, 56(3), 345–360.
- Kumar, R., & Singh, A. (2019). "Non-Silicone Surfactants in Polyurethane Foam Production: A Review." Polymer Engineering & Science, 59(8), 1645–1657.
- Müller, T., & Becker, F. (2021). "Performance Evaluation of Foam Stabilizers in Automotive Seating Applications." Proceedings of Foam Expo Europe 2021, Munich, Germany.
- Li, X., Zhao, J., & Zhou, W. (2022). "Hybrid Foam Stabilizer Systems: Formulation Challenges and Opportunities." Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(15), 51201.
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2023). "REACH Regulation and Foam Additives." Retrieved from official ECHA database (non-linked).
- American Chemistry Council. (2021). "Health and Environmental Assessment of Silicone-Based Foam Stabilizers." Washington, D.C.
If you’re still scratching your head trying to decide which stabilizer to use, remember: the foam world is vast, and there’s always room to experiment. After all, every great invention started with a little bubbling curiosity 😉.
Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com