Comparing UV Absorber UV-234 with other benzotriazole UV absorbers
Comparing UV Absorber UV-234 with Other Benzotriazole UV Absorbers
When it comes to protecting materials from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet (UV) rays, not all UV absorbers are created equal. Among the most widely used classes of these protective compounds are benzotriazoles — a family of organic molecules that have proven their worth in everything from plastics and coatings to cosmetics and textiles.
In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into UV-234, one of the more popular benzotriazole UV absorbers, and compare it with other well-known members of its chemical clan — including UV-326, UV-327, UV-328, and UV-329. We’ll explore their molecular structures, physical properties, performance characteristics, and applications across various industries. Think of this as a roundtable discussion among UV protectors — who brings what to the table?
🧪 What Are Benzotriazole UV Absorbers?
Before we get into the specifics of UV-234 and its siblings, let’s quickly recap what makes benzotriazoles so effective at blocking UV radiation.
Benzotriazoles work by absorbing UV light and dissipating the energy as harmless heat. This prevents the UV photons from initiating degradation processes such as oxidation or chain scission in polymers. Their effectiveness stems from their aromatic ring structure, which allows for efficient conjugation and energy absorption.
The general structure of benzotriazole UV absorbers typically includes:
- A substituted benzene ring
- A triazole ring
- Alkyl or alkoxy side chains that influence solubility and compatibility with different matrices
These structural variations give each compound unique performance traits — and that’s where our comparison begins.
🌞 Introducing UV-234
Let’s start with UV-234 — the star of our show. Officially known as 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)phenol, UV-234 is often praised for its excellent UV absorption range and good thermal stability.
Key Features of UV-234:
| Property | Value/Description |
|---|---|
| Molecular Formula | C₂₆H₂₃N₃O |
| Molecular Weight | ~385.48 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Solubility in Water | Practically insoluble |
| Solubility in Organic Solvents | Good in common solvents like xylene, toluene |
| UV Absorption Range | 300–380 nm |
| Thermal Stability | High |
| Light Fastness | Very good |
One of the standout features of UV-234 is its high molar extinction coefficient, meaning it can absorb a lot of UV light even at low concentrations. It also shows low volatility, making it suitable for high-temperature processing environments.
According to a study published in Polymer Degradation and Stability (Zhang et al., 2017), UV-234 demonstrated superior performance in polyolefins under accelerated weathering tests compared to several other benzotriazoles.
🧬 Structural Comparison with Other Benzotriazoles
To understand how UV-234 stacks up against its relatives, let’s look at the molecular structures and key functional groups.
| Compound | Structure Summary | Substituents on Phenol Ring | Alkyl Chain Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV-234 | 2H-Benzotriazole attached to a phenol ring with two bulky bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl) groups | Two bulky aryl-substituted alkyls | Long |
| UV-326 | 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-methyl-6-(tert-butyl)phenol | Methyl and tert-butyl | Medium |
| UV-327 | 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(tert-butyl)phenol | Two tert-butyl | Short-medium |
| UV-328 | 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(tert-octyl)phenol | Two tert-octyl | Long |
| UV-329 | 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-(octyloxy)phenol | Octyloxy | Long |
As you can see, UV-234 has bulky substituents — specifically, the 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl groups — which contribute to its high stability and compatibility with nonpolar matrices like polyolefins and styrenics.
📊 Performance Comparison Across Key Parameters
Now that we’ve seen the structure, let’s move on to performance. In this section, we’ll compare UV-234 with UV-326, UV-327, UV-328, and UV-329 based on several important criteria: UV absorption efficiency, thermal stability, volatility, solubility, and application suitability.
Table 1: Comparative Performance of Benzotriazole UV Absorbers
| Parameter | UV-234 | UV-326 | UV-327 | UV-328 | UV-329 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UV Absorption Max (nm) | 345–355 | 340–350 | 345–355 | 348–358 | 340–350 |
| Molar Extinction Coeff | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | Moderate |
| Volatility | Low | Moderate | Low | High | High |
| Thermal Stability | Excellent | Good | Good | Moderate | Moderate |
| Solubility in Polymers | Good | Good | Fair | High | High |
| Migration Resistance | Excellent | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Low |
| Cost | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | Moderate |
From this table, a few trends emerge:
- UV-234 and UV-328 have the highest molar extinction coefficients, meaning they’re very efficient at absorbing UV light.
- UV-234 stands out for its low volatility and high thermal stability, making it ideal for high-temperature applications like extrusion and injection molding.
- UV-328 and UV-329, while offering good UV absorption and solubility, tend to migrate more easily in polymer systems, which can be a drawback in long-term outdoor applications.
- UV-326 and UV-327 are generally lower-cost options but may require higher loading levels to achieve comparable protection.
🛡️ Application Suitability
Each UV absorber has its sweet spot in terms of material compatibility and application environment. Let’s explore where UV-234 shines — and where others might take the lead.
Table 2: Recommended Applications
| Compound | Polyolefins | PVC | Coatings | Adhesives | Textiles | Cosmetics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UV-234 | ✅✅✅ | ❌ | ✅✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| UV-326 | ✅✅ | ✅ | ✅✅ | ✅✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| UV-327 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| UV-328 | ✅✅✅ | ❌ | ✅✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| UV-329 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅✅ | ✅✅✅ |
🔍 UV-234: The Workhorse of Polyolefins
UV-234 is particularly well-suited for polyolefins such as HDPE, LDPE, and PP. Its bulky structure reduces migration and volatilization during processing, which is crucial for maintaining long-term UV protection in products like agricultural films, geomembranes, and automotive parts.
A comparative study by Wang et al. (2019) in Journal of Applied Polymer Science showed that UV-234 provided significantly better retention of tensile strength and elongation in polypropylene after 1000 hours of xenon arc exposure than UV-327 and UV-326.
🖌️ UV-326 & UV-327: Versatile Coaters
UV-326 and UV-327 are commonly found in coatings and adhesives, especially those based on acrylics or alkyds. They offer good color stability and moderate cost, making them favorites in architectural and industrial coatings.
However, UV-327 has come under regulatory scrutiny in some regions due to potential environmental persistence and bioaccumulation concerns — something to keep in mind when choosing between the two.
👕 UV-328 & UV-329: On the Move
UV-328 and UV-329, with their longer alkyl chains, are more soluble in flexible substrates like rubber and soft PVC. UV-329, in particular, is used in textiles and personal care products because of its ability to bind effectively to fibers and skin.
That said, UV-328 has been identified as a persistent organic pollutant (POP) by the Stockholm Convention and is now restricted in many countries — a cautionary tale about long-term environmental impact.
💰 Cost vs. Performance: Is UV-234 Worth It?
Cost is always a factor in formulation decisions. While UV-234 offers top-tier performance, it also tends to be more expensive than UV-326 and UV-327. However, its lower required dosage and longer-lasting protection can offset the initial cost over time.
| Compound | Approximate Price (USD/kg) | Dosage Level (%) | Longevity |
|---|---|---|---|
| UV-234 | $35–$45 | 0.1–0.5 | High |
| UV-326 | $20–$30 | 0.2–1.0 | Moderate |
| UV-327 | $25–$35 | 0.2–1.0 | Moderate |
| UV-328 | $40–$50 | 0.1–0.5 | Low–Moderate |
| UV-329 | $25–$35 | 0.1–1.0 | Moderate |
In high-performance applications where failure isn’t an option — think automotive components exposed to years of sunlight — UV-234 is often the best investment.
🧪 Synergistic Effects with HALS
Another important consideration is how UV-234 works in combination with other stabilizers, especially hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS).
Studies have shown that combining UV-234 with HALS like Tinuvin 770 or Chimassorb 944 can result in synergistic effects, providing enhanced protection beyond what either additive could achieve alone.
For example, a 2021 paper in Polymer Testing (Chen & Li) reported that a blend of UV-234 and HALS extended the service life of polyethylene greenhouse films by over 40% compared to using UV-234 alone.
This synergy occurs because UV absorbers like UV-234 act as the first line of defense, capturing UV photons before they initiate degradation. Meanwhile, HALS mop up free radicals that do form, preventing further damage.
So if you’re looking to build a truly robust UV protection system, consider pairing UV-234 with a compatible HALS.
📉 Regulatory and Environmental Considerations
Environmental regulations are increasingly shaping the selection of UV absorbers. UV-328, for instance, is now classified as a POP under the Stockholm Convention due to its persistence and tendency to accumulate in ecosystems. UV-327 has also raised red flags in some jurisdictions.
UV-234, on the other hand, has a relatively clean regulatory profile. It is currently approved for use in food contact materials in the EU and US, though ongoing monitoring is advised as global regulations evolve.
Still, it’s wise to conduct a lifecycle assessment of your chosen UV absorber, especially for products intended for outdoor use or sensitive markets like food packaging or children’s toys.
🧠 Final Thoughts: Who Wins the UV Showdown?
So, after all that, where does UV-234 stand in the grand lineup of benzotriazole UV absorbers?
- UV-234 excels in high-performance, long-life applications where thermal stability, low volatility, and resistance to migration are critical.
- Compared to UV-326 and UV-327, it offers superior durability and longevity.
- Compared to UV-328 and UV-329, it avoids many of the environmental pitfalls and regulatory headaches.
Of course, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Your choice should depend on the specific needs of your application — whether that’s cost control, ease of processing, regulatory compliance, or sheer endurance under the sun.
If UV absorbers were superheroes, UV-234 would be the seasoned veteran — maybe not the cheapest or flashiest — but definitely someone you want watching your back when the UV rays start flying.
📚 References
- Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2017). "Comparative Study of Benzotriazole UV Absorbers in Polyolefin Stabilization." Polymer Degradation and Stability, 142, 123–131.
- Wang, L., Zhao, Q., & Sun, T. (2019). "Performance Evaluation of UV Stabilizers in Polypropylene Under Accelerated Weathering Conditions." Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 136(18), 47521.
- Chen, X., & Li, R. (2021). "Synergistic Effects of UV-234 and HALS in Polyethylene Films." Polymer Testing, 94, 107044.
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2022). "Restriction of UV-328 under the Stockholm Convention."
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2020). "Substances Added to Food (formerly EAFUS)."
So whether you’re formulating a new polymer composite or just trying to make sense of the UV protection maze, remember: UV-234 might just be the shield you need when the sun won’t stop shining. ☀️🛡️
Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com