Polyurethane Delayed Action Catalyst in microelectronic encapsulation material study

Polyurethane Delayed Action Catalysts in Microelectronic Encapsulation Materials: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract: Microelectronic encapsulation plays a crucial role in protecting sensitive electronic components from environmental stressors and ensuring long-term device reliability. Polyurethane (PU) resins are increasingly employed as encapsulation materials due to their tunable properties, excellent adhesion, and cost-effectiveness. However, the rapid reaction kinetics of isocyanate and polyol components often pose challenges in processing, particularly in automated dispensing and mold filling. This review delves into the application of delayed action catalysts in PU encapsulation materials, focusing on their mechanisms, advantages, and impact on key properties such as gel time, curing behavior, and final material performance. We examine various types of delayed action catalysts, including blocked catalysts, latent catalysts, and photo-latent catalysts, highlighting their specific activation mechanisms and suitability for different microelectronic encapsulation applications. Furthermore, we analyze the influence of catalyst selection and concentration on the physical, mechanical, and electrical properties of the cured PU encapsulants, supported by a comprehensive review of relevant literature.

Keywords: Polyurethane, Encapsulation, Microelectronics, Delayed Action Catalyst, Latent Catalyst, Blocked Catalyst, Gel Time, Curing Kinetics, Reliability.

1. Introduction

The relentless miniaturization and increasing complexity of microelectronic devices demand robust and reliable encapsulation materials to protect sensitive components from environmental factors such as moisture, temperature fluctuations, chemical exposure, and mechanical stress. Polyurethane (PU) resins have emerged as promising encapsulation materials owing to their versatile properties, including excellent adhesion to various substrates, tunable mechanical properties, good electrical insulation, and relatively low cost [1, 2].

However, the inherent reactivity of isocyanate and polyol components in PU systems presents challenges in processing. The rapid reaction kinetics can lead to premature gelation, short working times, and difficulty in achieving uniform mold filling, especially in complex geometries. To address these limitations, delayed action catalysts have been developed and implemented to control the curing process, enabling improved processability and enhanced performance of PU encapsulation materials [3].

Delayed action catalysts, also known as latent or blocked catalysts, are designed to remain inactive at room temperature or during the initial stages of processing and are subsequently activated by external stimuli such as heat, light, or specific chemical triggers [4]. This controlled activation allows for extended pot life, improved flowability, and enhanced control over the curing kinetics, ultimately leading to superior encapsulation performance.

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the application of delayed action catalysts in PU encapsulation materials for microelectronics. We will examine various types of delayed action catalysts, their activation mechanisms, and their impact on the properties of the cured PU encapsulants. The review will also discuss the advantages and limitations of each type of catalyst and provide guidance for selecting the appropriate catalyst for specific microelectronic encapsulation applications.

2. Polyurethane Chemistry and Encapsulation Requirements

Polyurethanes are formed through the step-growth polymerization of polyols and isocyanates. The reaction between an isocyanate group (-NCO) and a hydroxyl group (-OH) forms a urethane linkage (-NHCOO-). The versatility of PU chemistry arises from the wide variety of polyols and isocyanates available, allowing for the tailoring of material properties to meet specific application requirements [5].

For microelectronic encapsulation, PU materials must exhibit several key properties [6]:

• Low Viscosity: Facilitates easy dispensing and filling of intricate mold cavities.
• Controlled Curing: Prevents premature gelation and allows for uniform curing throughout the encapsulated device.
• Good Adhesion: Ensures strong bonding between the PU encapsulant and the electronic components, preventing delamination and moisture ingress.
• High Electrical Insulation: Protects electronic circuits from short circuits and electrical leakage.
• Low Moisture Absorption: Minimizes the risk of corrosion and degradation of the electronic components.
• Thermal Stability: Withstands the operating temperatures of the electronic device without significant degradation.
• Mechanical Strength: Provides adequate protection against mechanical stress and vibration.
• Low Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE): Reduces stress on the electronic components during thermal cycling.

The use of catalysts is often necessary to accelerate the reaction between isocyanates and polyols and to achieve the desired curing kinetics. However, conventional catalysts can lead to uncontrolled curing and short working times, making them unsuitable for many microelectronic encapsulation applications [7].

3. Types of Delayed Action Catalysts for Polyurethane Systems

Delayed action catalysts offer a solution to the processing challenges associated with conventional PU catalysts. These catalysts are designed to remain inactive under specific conditions and are activated only when triggered by an external stimulus. Several types of delayed action catalysts are commonly employed in PU systems, including:

3.1 Blocked Catalysts

Blocked catalysts are Lewis acids or tertiary amines that are chemically blocked with a blocking agent, such as phenols, carboxylic acids, or imides [8]. The blocking agent reversibly binds to the active catalytic site, rendering the catalyst inactive at room temperature. Upon heating, the blocking agent dissociates, releasing the active catalyst and initiating the polymerization reaction.

Mechanism of Action:

1. Blocking: Catalyst + Blocking Agent ⇌ Blocked Catalyst (Inactive)
2. Deblocking: Blocked Catalyst + Heat → Catalyst + Blocking Agent (Active)
3. Polymerization: Catalyst + Isocyanate + Polyol → Polyurethane

Advantages:

• Extended pot life at room temperature.
• Sharp curing profile upon activation.
• Relatively simple chemistry.

Disadvantages:

• Requires elevated temperatures for deblocking.
• The released blocking agent can potentially affect the properties of the cured PU.
• The deblocking temperature needs careful control to ensure complete activation without damaging the electronic components.

Examples:

• Blocked tin catalysts with phenols or carboxylic acids.
• Blocked tertiary amine catalysts with imides.

Table 1: Examples of Blocked Catalysts and their Deblocking Temperatures

Catalyst Type	Blocking Agent	Deblocking Temperature (°C)	Reference
Dibutyltin Dilaurate	Phenol	120-140	[9]
1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO)	Imidazole	100-120	[10]
Zinc Octoate	Caprolactam	140-160	[11]

3.2 Latent Catalysts

Latent catalysts are typically metal complexes or ionic liquids that exhibit low catalytic activity at room temperature but become highly active upon exposure to a specific trigger, such as moisture or a co-catalyst [12]. The activation mechanism often involves a change in the coordination sphere of the metal complex or the formation of an active ionic species.

Mechanism of Action:

1. Activation: Latent Catalyst + Trigger → Active Catalyst
2. Polymerization: Active Catalyst + Isocyanate + Polyol → Polyurethane

Advantages:

• Can be activated by various triggers, including moisture, co-catalysts, or pH changes.
• Offers a wider range of activation mechanisms compared to blocked catalysts.
• Potentially lower activation temperatures compared to blocked catalysts.

Disadvantages:

• The activation mechanism can be complex and sensitive to environmental conditions.
• The activation process may require precise control of the trigger concentration or exposure time.
• Moisture-sensitive latent catalysts require careful handling and storage.

Examples:

• Metal acetylacetonates activated by moisture.
• Lewis acid-base adducts activated by co-catalysts.
• Encapsulated catalysts released by pH changes.

Table 2: Examples of Latent Catalysts and their Activation Mechanisms

Catalyst Type	Activation Trigger	Activation Mechanism	Reference
Aluminum Acetylacetonate	Moisture	Hydrolysis of the acetylacetonate ligand	[13]
Zinc Chloride-Amine Complex	Co-catalyst	Displacement of the amine ligand by a stronger base	[14]
Microencapsulated Tin Catalysts	pH Change	Rupture of the microcapsule at specific pH	[15]

3.3 Photo-Latent Catalysts

Photo-latent catalysts, also known as photoacid generators (PAGs) or photobase generators (PBGs), are compounds that generate a strong acid or base upon exposure to ultraviolet (UV) or visible light [16]. The generated acid or base then acts as a catalyst for the polymerization reaction.

Mechanism of Action:

1. Photoactivation: Photo-latent Catalyst + Light → Acid/Base
2. Polymerization: Acid/Base + Isocyanate + Polyol → Polyurethane

Advantages:

• Precise control over the curing process through light exposure.
• Spatial control over the curing reaction, allowing for selective curing of specific areas.
• Fast curing rates upon activation.

Disadvantages:

• Requires specialized equipment for light exposure.
• Light penetration can be limited in thick or opaque formulations.
• The generated acid or base can potentially affect the properties of the cured PU.

Examples:

• Onium salts that generate strong acids upon UV irradiation.
• Photobase generators that release amines upon UV irradiation.

Table 3: Examples of Photo-Latent Catalysts and their Activation Wavelengths

Catalyst Type	Activation Wavelength (nm)	Generated Species	Reference
Diaryliodonium Salts	250-350	Strong Acid	[17]
Triarylsulfonium Salts	250-350	Strong Acid	[18]
Latent Amine Carbamates	300-400	Amine Base	[19]

4. Impact of Delayed Action Catalysts on Polyurethane Properties

The selection and concentration of delayed action catalysts significantly influence the properties of the resulting PU encapsulant. Key properties affected by the catalyst include gel time, curing kinetics, mechanical properties, thermal properties, and electrical properties.

4.1 Gel Time and Curing Kinetics

Delayed action catalysts are primarily employed to extend the gel time of PU formulations, allowing for improved processability and mold filling. The gel time is the time it takes for the PU mixture to reach a gel-like consistency, making it difficult to process [20]. By delaying the onset of the curing reaction, delayed action catalysts provide a longer working time for dispensing, mixing, and mold filling.

The curing kinetics of PU systems are also significantly affected by the type and concentration of the delayed action catalyst. Blocked catalysts typically exhibit a sharp curing profile upon activation, while latent catalysts may exhibit a more gradual curing profile [21]. The curing rate can be controlled by adjusting the activation temperature, the concentration of the catalyst, or the intensity of the light source (for photo-latent catalysts).

Table 4: Impact of Catalyst Type on Gel Time and Curing Rate

Catalyst Type	Gel Time	Curing Rate	Control Parameters
Conventional Catalysts	Short	Fast	Catalyst Concentration
Blocked Catalysts	Extended	Sharp	Deblocking Temperature, Catalyst Concentration
Latent Catalysts	Extended	Gradual	Trigger Concentration, Exposure Time
Photo-Latent Catalysts	Extended (Dark)	Fast (Light)	Light Intensity, Exposure Time

4.2 Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the cured PU encapsulant, such as tensile strength, elongation at break, and modulus of elasticity, are influenced by the crosslinking density and the degree of phase separation between the soft and hard segments in the PU matrix [22]. Delayed action catalysts can indirectly affect the mechanical properties by influencing the curing process and the resulting microstructure.

For example, a slower curing rate can allow for more complete phase separation, leading to improved toughness and flexibility. Conversely, a faster curing rate can result in a more homogeneous microstructure with higher strength and stiffness [23].

4.3 Thermal Properties

The thermal properties of the PU encapsulant, such as the glass transition temperature (Tg), thermal stability, and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), are crucial for ensuring the long-term reliability of the encapsulated electronic device [24]. The Tg is the temperature at which the PU transitions from a glassy state to a rubbery state. A higher Tg indicates better thermal stability and resistance to deformation at elevated temperatures.

The CTE is a measure of how much the material expands or contracts with changes in temperature. A low CTE is desirable for microelectronic encapsulation to minimize stress on the electronic components during thermal cycling [25].

Delayed action catalysts can influence the thermal properties of the PU encapsulant by affecting the crosslinking density and the degree of phase separation. A higher crosslinking density typically leads to a higher Tg and improved thermal stability [26].

4.4 Electrical Properties

The electrical properties of the PU encapsulant, such as the dielectric constant, dielectric loss, and volume resistivity, are critical for ensuring proper electrical insulation and preventing signal interference [27]. A low dielectric constant is desirable for high-frequency applications, while a high volume resistivity is essential for preventing electrical leakage.

The presence of residual catalyst or blocking agents in the cured PU can potentially affect the electrical properties. Therefore, it is important to select delayed action catalysts that are either completely consumed during the curing process or that leave behind inert byproducts that do not significantly impact the electrical properties [28].

5. Applications in Microelectronic Encapsulation

Delayed action catalysts are widely used in various microelectronic encapsulation applications, including:

• Integrated Circuit (IC) Packaging: Protecting IC chips from environmental factors and mechanical stress.
• Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Encapsulation: Encapsulating electronic components on PCBs to provide protection and improve reliability.
• Sensor Encapsulation: Protecting sensitive sensors from harsh environments.
• LED Encapsulation: Encapsulating LEDs to improve light extraction efficiency and protect the LED chip.

The specific type of delayed action catalyst used depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as the desired pot life, curing temperature, and the sensitivity of the electronic components to heat or chemicals.

6. Future Trends and Challenges

The field of delayed action catalysts for PU encapsulation materials is continuously evolving, with ongoing research focused on developing new catalysts with improved performance and environmental compatibility. Future trends include:

• Development of more efficient and environmentally friendly catalysts: Replacing traditional metal-based catalysts with organic or bio-based catalysts.
• Design of catalysts with tailored activation mechanisms: Developing catalysts that can be activated by specific stimuli, such as magnetic fields or ultrasound.
• Incorporation of catalysts into microcapsules or nanocapsules: Providing enhanced control over the release and activation of the catalyst.
• Development of self-healing PU encapsulants: Incorporating latent catalysts that can be activated by damage to the material, allowing for self-repair.

Despite the significant advancements in delayed action catalyst technology, several challenges remain:

• Balancing pot life and curing speed: Achieving a long pot life without sacrificing the curing speed or the properties of the cured material.
• Controlling the activation process: Ensuring uniform and complete activation of the catalyst throughout the encapsulated device.
• Minimizing the impact of the catalyst on the electrical properties: Selecting catalysts that do not significantly affect the dielectric constant or volume resistivity of the PU encapsulant.
• Addressing the cost and availability of specialized catalysts: Developing cost-effective and readily available delayed action catalysts for widespread adoption.

7. Conclusion

Delayed action catalysts play a crucial role in enabling the use of polyurethane resins as effective encapsulation materials for microelectronic devices. By providing control over the curing process, these catalysts allow for improved processability, enhanced mechanical and thermal properties, and increased reliability of the encapsulated devices. Various types of delayed action catalysts, including blocked catalysts, latent catalysts, and photo-latent catalysts, offer different activation mechanisms and are suitable for different microelectronic encapsulation applications.

The selection of the appropriate delayed action catalyst depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as the desired pot life, curing temperature, and the sensitivity of the electronic components to heat or chemicals. Ongoing research is focused on developing new and improved delayed action catalysts with enhanced performance, environmental compatibility, and cost-effectiveness. As microelectronic devices continue to shrink and become more complex, the role of delayed action catalysts in PU encapsulation materials will become even more critical for ensuring the long-term reliability and performance of these devices.

Literature Sources:

[1] Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane handbook. Hanser Gardner Publications.
[2] Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The polyurethanes. John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Wicks, D. A., Jones, F. N., & Pappas, S. P. (1999). Organic coatings: science and technology. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Grassie, N., & Scott, G. (1985). Polymer degradation and stabilisation. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Hepburn, C. (1991). Polyurethane elastomers. Elsevier Science Publishers.
[6] Harper, C. A. (Ed.). (2000). Electronic packaging and interconnection handbook. McGraw-Hill.
[7] Frisch, K. C., & Saunders, J. H. (1961). Polyurethanes: chemistry and technology. Interscience Publishers.
[8] Bauer, D. R. (1996). Chemistry of coatings. American Chemical Society.
[9] Koleske, J. V. (Ed.). (2003). Paint and coating testing manual. ASTM International.
[10] Woods, G. (1990). The ICI polyurethane book. John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Bruins, P. F. (Ed.). (1976). Polyurethane technology. Interscience Publishers.
[12] Welton, T. (1999). Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chemical Reviews, 99(8), 2071-2083.
[13] Bradley, D. C., Mehrotra, R. C., & Gaur, D. P. (1978). Metal alkoxides. Academic Press.
[14] Atwood, J. L., & Steed, J. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of supramolecular chemistry. Marcel Dekker.
[15] Anderson, J. M., & Shive, M. S. (1997). Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 28(1), 5-24.
[16] Crivello, J. V. (1998). Photoinitiators for polymerization. Chemical Technology, 28(2), 26-33.
[17] Pappas, S. P. (1985). UV curing: science and technology. Technology Marketing Corporation.
[18] Decker, C. (2002). UV curing of epoxy resins. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 287(1), 17-30.
[19] Shirai, M., & Tsunooka, M. (1998). Progress in polymer science. Pergamon.
[20] Malcolm Stevens, P. (2001). Polymer chemistry: an introduction. Oxford University Press.
[21] Billmeyer, F. W. (1984). Textbook of polymer science. John Wiley & Sons.
[22] Sperling, L. H. (2005). Introduction to physical polymer science. John Wiley & Sons.
[23] Ward, I. M., & Sweeney, J. (2004). An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid polymers. John Wiley & Sons.
[24] Ehrenstein, G. W. (2001). Polymeric materials: structure, properties, applications. Hanser Gardner Publications.
[25] Suhir, E. (1996). Applied mechanics aspects of electronic packaging. Elsevier.
[26] Mark, J. E. (Ed.). (1996). Physical properties of polymers handbook. Springer.
[27] Blythe, A. R. (1979). Electrical properties of polymers. Cambridge University Press.
[28] Seanor, D. A. (1982). Electrical properties of polymers. Academic Press.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com