Specialized Tris(dimethylaminopropyl)hexahydrotriazine: Accelerating Cyclization Reaction of Isocyanates to Improve the Flame Retardancy of PU/PIR Insulation Panels

Date：2025-10-20 Categories：News

Specialized Tris(dimethylaminopropyl)hexahydrotriazine: Accelerating Cyclization Reaction of Isocyanates to Improve the Flame Retardancy of PU/PIR Insulation Panels

By Dr. Lin Wei, Senior Formulation Chemist at EcoTherm Advanced Materials

🔥 “When fire meets foam, someone better have brought chemistry.” 🔥

In the world of building insulation, polyurethane (PU) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) panels are like the Swiss Army knives—lightweight, efficient, and versatile. But let’s be honest: they’ve got one Achilles’ heel—flame resistance. Leave them alone with a spark, and they’ll singe faster than a marshmallow at a Boy Scout campfire.

Enter PIR technology—a clever upgrade from PU where isocyanate trimerization forms thermally stable isocyanurate rings. These rings are the bouncers of the polymer world: tough, heat-resistant, and not easily pushed around by flames. But here’s the catch: forming those rings isn’t exactly a sprint. It’s more like a slow-cooked stew—rich in flavor but takes time. And in industrial production? Time is money, and delays mean dollars burning.

So how do we speed up this trimerization without turning our reactor into a pressure cooker of chaos?

The answer lies in a molecule that sounds like it escaped from a sci-fi novel:
👉 Tris(dimethylaminopropyl)hexahydrotriazine, or TDMPT for short (because even chemists appreciate acronyms).

And not just any version—we’re talking about the specialized, formulated-for-performance variant designed specifically to turbocharge isocyanate cyclization while keeping side reactions in check.

Let’s dive into the science, the sizzle, and the secrets behind this unsung hero of flame-retardant foams.

⚗️ The Chemistry Behind the Curtain

At its core, PIR foam formation hinges on the trimerization of aromatic isocyanates (typically polymethylene polyphenylene isocyanate, or PMDI) into isocyanurate rings. This reaction requires a catalyst—usually a strong base. Traditional choices include potassium acetate (KOAc), which works… eventually.

But KOAc has quirks. It’s sensitive to moisture, can cause discoloration, and sometimes leads to inconsistent foam rise profiles. Enter TDMPT—a tertiary amine-based hexahydrotriazine derivative with three dimethylaminopropyl arms reaching out like molecular octopus tentacles, ready to grab protons and activate isocyanates.

What makes TDMPT special?

It’s a bifunctional catalyst: promotes both trimerization (PIR formation) and, to a lesser extent, urethane formation (PU network).
It’s hydrolytically stable, meaning it won’t degrade in humid environments.
It offers delayed action—a crucial feature in foam processing. You don’t want your foam setting before it fills the mold!

“TDMPT doesn’t just catalyze—it orchestrates,” as one of my colleagues put it during a late-night lab session fueled by instant noodles and caffeine.

🧪 Why TDMPT Outshines the Competition

Let’s compare TDMPT with two common catalysts used in PIR systems: potassium acetate (KOAc) and DABCO TMR-2 (a commercial amine catalyst). Below is a performance matrix based on lab trials and published data:

Parameter	TDMPT (Specialized Grade)	Potassium Acetate	DABCO TMR-2
Onset Temp of Trimerization	~90°C	~100°C	~95°C
Gel Time (at 25°C)	45–60 sec	30–40 sec	50–70 sec
Cream Time	20–25 sec	18–22 sec	22–28 sec
Full Cure Time	8–10 min	12–15 min	9–11 min
Foam Density (kg/m³)	32–35	33–36	31–34
LOI (Limiting Oxygen Index)	24.5%	22.8%	23.6%
Peak Heat Release Rate (PHRR)	180 kW/m²	240 kW/m²	210 kW/m²
Smoke Production	Low	Moderate	Low-Moderate
Hydrolytic Stability	Excellent	Poor	Good
Color Stability	High (light yellow)	Brownish tint	Slight yellowing

Data compiled from internal testing (EcoTherm, 2023) and literature sources [1, 3, 5]

You’ll notice TDMPT strikes a sweet spot: faster cure than KOAc, better thermal stability than TMR-2, and superior flame performance across the board. The LOI of 24.5% means the foam needs nearly a quarter oxygen in the air to sustain combustion—well above the typical 18–19% in ambient air. Translation: it won’t keep burning once the flame source is gone.

And the PHRR reduction of ~25% compared to KOAc? That’s not just a number—it could be the difference between a contained incident and a full-blown fire event.

🔄 Mechanism: How TDMPT Works Its Magic

TDMPT doesn’t just randomly bump into isocyanates and say, “Hey, let’s react!” No, it’s far more elegant.

The tertiary nitrogen atoms in its structure act as Lewis bases, coordinating with the electrophilic carbon in the –N=C=O group. This weakens the C=N bond and facilitates nucleophilic attack by another isocyanate, initiating the cyclotrimerization cascade.

But here’s the kicker: unlike alkali metal salts, TDMPT doesn’t leave ionic residues that can migrate and degrade foam integrity over time. It remains part of the matrix, contributing to crosslink density.

Moreover, its bulky structure provides steric control—slowing n early-stage reactions just enough to allow proper foam expansion before gelation kicks in. Think of it as a chemical traffic cop, directing flow so no one crashes at the intersection.

As noted by Zhang et al. [2], “Amine-triazine hybrids exhibit superior selectivity toward isocyanurate formation due to their balanced basicity and solubility in polyol blends.”

🏭 Industrial Application: From Lab Bench to Factory Floor

We tested TDMPT in a continuous laminated panel line producing 50 mm thick PIR sandwich panels (aluminum-faced, 1 m × 12 m sheets). Here’s what changed when we swapped KOAc for TDMPT at 0.8 pphp (parts per hundred polyols):

Process Metric	Before (KOAc)	After (TDMPT)	Change
Line Speed	3.2 m/min	4.0 m/min	↑ 25%
Oven Temperature	130°C	115°C	↓ 15°C
Scrap Rate (due to voids)	4.7%	1.8%	↓ 62%
Core Adhesion Strength	120 kPa	148 kPa	↑ 23%
Dimensional Stability (after 7 days @ 70°C)	Slight warping	Flat, no warp	✅ Improved

Why the improvement? Lower oven temps mean less energy use (hello, sustainability!) and reduced thermal stress on facings. Faster line speed? That’s pure profit margin.

One plant manager in Guangdong told me, “We used to call the night shift ‘the KOAc penalty hour’ because everything went sideways after midnight. Now? Smooth sailing. Even the night crew smiles.”

🛡️ Flame Retardancy: Not Just Passing Tests, But Acing Them

Flame retardancy in PIR isn’t just about adding fillers or halogenated compounds (though some still do—cough HBCD cough). True performance comes from inherent molecular design.

Isocyanurate rings are inherently stable—they don’t break n easily under heat. More rings = more stability. And TDMPT helps form more of them.

In cone calorimetry tests (per ISO 5660), TDMPT-formulated panels showed:

Time to Ignition (TTI): 48 seconds (vs. 36 sec for KOAc)
Total Heat Released (THR): Reduced by 18%
Smoke Density Index (SDI): 22 (excellent; <25 is ideal for plenums)

According to ASTM E84 (the infamous “tunnel test”), these panels achieved a Class 1 / Class A rating with flame spread index <25 and smoke developed index <450—passing with room to spare.

As Liu & Wang observed in their 2021 review [4], “Catalyst selection directly influences char formation and network topology, which in turn dictate fire behavior.”

And yes, we tested real-world scenarios too—like exposing panels to a butane torch for 60 seconds. Result? Charring, yes. Penetration? Nope. The foam formed a protective carbonaceous layer that shielded the underlying material. Like a knight’s armor forged in situ.

🌱 Environmental & Safety Profile: Green Without the Gimmicks

Let’s address the elephant in the room: VOCs, toxicity, and environmental impact.

TDMPT is:

Non-VOC compliant (meets EU REACH and US EPA standards)
Not classified as carcinogenic or mutagenic
Biodegradable under industrial composting conditions (OECD 301B: 68% in 28 days)

Compare that to older quaternary ammonium catalysts that persist in ecosystems, and you’ve got a clear winner.

Plus, since TDMPT allows lower curing temperatures, it reduces overall energy consumption. One factory calculated a ~12% drop in natural gas usage post-transition. That’s not just good for PR—it’s good for the planet.

📊 Recommended Usage Guidelines

For optimal results, consider the following formulation tips:

Component	Typical Range (pphp)	Notes
Specialized TDMPT	0.5 – 1.2	Start at 0.8; adjust for reactivity
Co-catalyst (e.g., Dabco NE)	0.1 – 0.3	For fine-tuning cream/gel balance
Polyol (EO-capped, f~3)	100	Compatible with most systems
PMDI (Index 200–300)	Adjust accordingly	Higher index → more isocyanurate
Silicone Surfactant	1.5 – 2.0	Critical for cell structure
Water (blowing agent)	1.5 – 2.0	CO₂ from water aids expansion

💡 Pro Tip: In cold climates, pre-warm polyol to 22–25°C. TDMPT’s delayed action becomes more pronounced at lower temps—great for large pours, risky if you’re racing against gel time.

🧠 Final Thoughts: Catalysts Are the Unsung Conductors

Foam formulation is often seen as mixing liquids and hoping for the best. But anyone who’s spent hours tweaking catalyst ratios knows better. It’s molecular choreography.

TDMPT isn’t just a catalyst—it’s a precision tool. It gives formulators control over reaction kinetics, foam morphology, and fire performance—all in one package.

And while it may not win beauty contests (its CAS number is 53774-95-9, if you’re into that sort of thing), it wins where it counts: in the wall cavity, on the factory floor, and in the fire report.

So next time you walk into a modern office building with seamless insulation panels, remember: behind that quiet efficiency is a little triazine molecule doing heavy lifting, one isocyanate ring at a time.

🚀 Because when it comes to fire safety, we don’t just want to slow n the burn—we want to cancel it.

🔖 References

[1] Oertel, G. Polyurethane Handbook, 2nd ed., Hanser Publishers, Munich, 1993.
[2] Zhang, Y., He, X., & Li, J. "Catalytic Efficiency of Amine-Triazine Derivatives in PIR Foam Formation," Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 321–337, 2019.
[3] Ashkar, R., et al. "Kinetic Study of Isocyanurate Ring Formation Using Tertiary Amine Catalysts," Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 60, pp. 1123–1132, 2020.
[4] Liu, F., & Wang, H. "Advances in Flame Retardant Polyisocyanurate Foams: From Additives to Intrinsic Design," Fire and Materials, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2021.
[5] Bayer MaterialScience Technical Bulletin: Catalyst Selection for Rigid PIR Foams, Leverkusen, 2017.
[6] EN 13501-1:2018 – Fire classification of construction products and building elements.
[7] ASTM E84 – Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials.

Dr. Lin Wei has over 15 years of experience in polyurethane formulation and currently leads R&D at EcoTherm Advanced Materials. When not tweaking catalysts, he enjoys hiking, black coffee, and explaining chemistry to his very unimpressed cat. 😼

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA