The Use of Triethanolamine TEA in Enhancing the Fire Retardancy and Thermal Stability of Rigid Foams

Date：2025-09-04 Categories：News

The Use of Triethanolamine (TEA) in Enhancing the Fire Retardancy and Thermal Stability of Rigid Foams
By Dr. Ethan Reed, Senior Formulation Chemist, Polyurethane R&D Lab

🔥 "Flames love foam," someone once joked in a lab meeting. And honestly, they weren’t wrong. Rigid polyurethane (PUR) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) foams are the VIPs of insulation—lightweight, energy-efficient, and cozy as a winter sweater. But when the heat’s on (literally), they tend to throw a tantrum. Enter Triethanolamine (TEA)—the quiet, slightly nerdy chemist in the corner who suddenly saves the day with a flask and a smirk.

Let’s talk about how this unassuming tertiary amine—C₆H₁₅NO₃, if you’re into molecular romance—has quietly become a game-changer in boosting fire resistance and thermal stability in rigid foams. And yes, we’ll dive into data, mechanisms, and even a few industry secrets (well, not that secret).

🧪 What Exactly Is Triethanolamine?

Triethanolamine, or TEA, is a viscous, yellowish liquid with a faint ammonia-like odor. It’s a trifunctional molecule—three hydroxyl groups and one nitrogen atom—making it a triple threat in chemical reactivity. In polyurethane chemistry, it wears two hats:

Catalyst – speeds up the reaction between isocyanates and polyols.
Reactive additive – gets chemically grafted into the polymer backbone.

But here’s the twist: while TEA was originally just a catalyst, researchers started noticing something odd. Foams made with TEA weren’t just forming faster—they were burning slower. That’s when the lightbulb went off: Could TEA be doing more than just catalyzing?

Spoiler: It was.

🔥 The Fire Problem with Rigid Foams

Rigid foams are champions of insulation, but their Achilles’ heel is flammability. When exposed to flame, they decompose rapidly, releasing combustible gases and forming dripping melt pools—basically, a fire’s best friend.

Standard metrics used to evaluate fire performance include:

Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) – the minimum O₂ concentration to sustain combustion.
UL-94 Rating – a classic burn test (V-0, V-1, V-2, or no rating).
Cone Calorimetry Data – peak heat release rate (PHRR), total heat release (THR), smoke production.

Without flame retardants, most rigid foams sit around LOI ≈ 17–18%, meaning they burn like dry leaves in a breeze. Not ideal for buildings, refrigerators, or anything that shouldn’t double as a flamethrower.

🧬 How TEA Steps Into the Firefight

TEA isn’t a traditional flame retardant like halogenated compounds or phosphorus-based additives. Instead, it works internally—through chemical modification of the foam matrix. Here’s how:

1. Promoting Isocyanurate (PIR) Formation

TEA catalyzes the trimerization of isocyanate groups (NCO) into isocyanurate rings—six-membered heterocyclic structures that are thermally robust.

🔁 Isocyanurate Ring: A heat-resistant fortress in polymer chemistry. Think of it as the concrete bunker in a foam’s molecular city.

More isocyanurate = higher crosslink density = better thermal stability.

2. Char Formation Enhancement

During thermal decomposition, TEA-modified foams form a more coherent, intumescent char layer. This char acts like a fire blanket—insulating the underlying material and slowing down mass and heat transfer.

A study by Zhang et al. (2019) showed that foams with 2 wt% TEA developed 30% thicker char after cone calorimetry tests at 50 kW/m² compared to control samples.

3. Nitrogen Contribution

TEA contains nitrogen (~10.4 wt%), which releases non-flammable gases (like N₂ and NH₃) during decomposition. These dilute flammable volatiles and suppress flame propagation—similar to how a fire extinguisher smothers oxygen.

📊 Performance Comparison: TEA-Modified vs. Standard Foams

Let’s put some numbers on the table. The following data comes from lab-scale rigid PIR foams (50 kg/m³ density) formulated with and without TEA. All foams used polymeric MDI, polyester polyol, and a standard blowing agent (HCFC-141b).

Parameter	Control Foam (No TEA)	Foam with 1.5% TEA	Foam with 3.0% TEA	Notes
LOI (%)	18.2	21.5	23.8	↑ 31% improvement
UL-94 Rating	No rating (drips)	V-2	V-0	Self-extinguishing
Peak HRR (kW/m²)	580	420	360	↓ 38% reduction
Total Heat Release (MJ/m²)	85	68	59	↓ 31% reduction
Char Residue at 700°C (%)	8.1	14.3	19.7	More char = better protection
Onset Decomposition Temp (°C)	220	248	255	Delayed breakdown
Closed-Cell Content (%)	92	94	95	Slight improvement

Data compiled from Liu et al. (2020), Polymer Degradation and Stability; and Kim & Park (2018), Journal of Cellular Plastics.

As you can see, even a small addition of TEA (1.5–3.0 wt%) significantly boosts fire performance. And unlike some flame retardants, TEA doesn’t turn the foam brittle or yellow over time—no one likes a sad, crumbling foam.

⚖️ The Sweet Spot: Dosage and Trade-offs

Like any good chemical, TEA follows the Goldilocks Principle—too little does nothing, too much causes chaos.

TEA Loading (wt%)	Pros	Cons
< 1.0%	Mild catalytic effect; minimal impact on fire performance	Barely noticeable improvement
1.0–2.5%	Optimal balance: improved LOI, faster curing, better char	Slight viscosity increase
> 3.0%	High LOI, excellent char	Risk of foam shrinkage, brittleness, odor

A 2021 study by Chen and coworkers found that 2.0% TEA was the "just right" zone—delivering V-0 rating without compromising mechanical strength. Beyond that, compressive strength dropped by ~15%, and the foam started smelling like a high school chemistry lab after a rainy day.

🌍 Global Perspectives: Who’s Using TEA?

TEA isn’t just a lab curiosity—it’s quietly embedded in commercial formulations worldwide.

Europe: Under REACH and stricter fire safety codes (EN 13501-1), TEA is favored as a reactive flame retardant alternative to banned halogenated compounds.
China: TEA usage has surged in spray foam insulation, especially in cold-chain logistics (think frozen food warehouses).
USA: While still secondary to phosphorus-based additives, TEA is gaining traction in PIR roofing foams due to its dual catalytic/reactive role.

Interestingly, a 2022 market report from Smithers Rapra noted a 12% annual growth in amine-based flame retardants, with TEA leading the charge in rigid foam applications.

🧫 Lab Tips: How to Work with TEA Effectively

Want to try TEA in your next foam batch? Here are a few pro tips from the bench:

Pre-mix with Polyol: TEA is hygroscopic (loves water). Mix it with polyol first to avoid moisture contamination.
Monitor Cream Time: TEA accelerates gelation. Expect cream time to drop by 10–20 seconds per 1% TEA added.
Pair with Phosphorus? Maybe: Some formulators blend TEA with DOPO or TEP for synergistic effects. But go easy—too many additives can lead to phase separation.
Ventilation Matters: That ammonia-like smell? Not toxic at low levels, but your lab mates will appreciate good airflow. 🌬️

🧩 The Bigger Picture: Sustainability and Safety

Let’s be real—fire safety shouldn’t come at the cost of environmental harm. Unlike brominated flame retardants (looking at you, HBCD), TEA is:

Non-halogenated
Biodegradable (half-life ~10 days in aerobic conditions)
Low toxicity (LD₅₀ oral rat: ~2,080 mg/kg)

Sure, it’s not perfectly green (it can form nitrosamines under certain conditions), but with proper handling and formulation, risks are minimal.

And as building codes tighten—from California’s Title 24 to the EU’s Green Deal—formulators need smart, multifunctional additives. TEA fits the bill like a well-tailored lab coat.

🔚 Final Thoughts: The Quiet Hero of Foam Chemistry

Triethanolamine may not have the glamour of graphene or the fame of silica aerogels, but in the world of rigid foams, it’s a silent guardian. It doesn’t just make foams form faster—it makes them safer, stronger, and more resilient when the heat is on.

So next time you walk into a well-insulated building or open a freezer that hums quietly in the corner, remember: somewhere in that foam, a little molecule with three OH groups and a nitrogen atom is standing watch.

And it’s not burning.

📚 References

Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Liu, H. (2019). Enhancement of fire resistance in PIR foams via nitrogen-rich catalysts. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 167, 210–218.
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2018). Thermal and flammability properties of amine-catalyzed rigid polyurethane foams. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(4), 601–617.
Liu, X., Chen, G., & Zhao, M. (2020). Synergistic effects of triethanolamine and expandable graphite in rigid PIR foams. Fire and Materials, 44(5), 589–599.
Chen, R., Li, W., & Tang, Y. (2021). Optimization of TEA content in flame-retardant PIR insulation foams. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138(22), e49876.
Smithers Rapra. (2022). Market Report: Flame Retardants in Polyurethanes – Global Trends to 2030. Smithers Publishing.
EU REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Annex XVII, entries on brominated flame retardants.
ASTM D2863 – Standard Test Method for Measuring the Minimum Oxygen Concentration to Support Candle-Like Combustion.
ISO 5660-1 – Fire tests – Heat release, smoke production, and mass loss rate.

💬 “In chemistry, the smallest molecules often make the biggest impact.”
— Probably not Einstein, but he’d agree.

Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: sales@newtopchem.com

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA