Types of Polyurethane Delayed Action Catalyst and their selection for PU systems

Delayed Action Catalysts in Polyurethane Systems: A Comprehensive Overview

Abstract: Polyurethane (PU) materials find widespread application across diverse industries due to their tunable properties and versatility. The polymerization process, involving the reaction between isocyanates and polyols, is typically catalyzed to achieve desirable reaction rates and control over the final material characteristics. Delayed action catalysts (DACs) are a crucial subset of PU catalysts, engineered to provide an induction period before accelerating the reaction, offering enhanced processing control and improved product quality. This article provides a comprehensive overview of various types of polyurethane delayed action catalysts, their mechanisms of action, and selection criteria for specific PU system requirements. Key parameters influencing their performance, such as activation temperature, catalytic activity, and compatibility, are discussed in detail, alongside relevant literature and tabular data summarizing performance characteristics.

1. Introduction

Polyurethanes are a class of polymers characterized by the presence of the urethane linkage (-NHCOO-) in their molecular structure. They are synthesized through the reaction between a polyisocyanate and a polyol, often in the presence of catalysts, additives, and blowing agents. The versatility of PU chemistry allows for the creation of materials ranging from flexible foams to rigid plastics, coatings, adhesives, and elastomers.

The use of catalysts is essential for controlling the reaction rate and selectivity of the isocyanate-polyol reaction. Traditional catalysts, such as tertiary amines and organometallic compounds, are highly effective but can lead to rapid reactions, short processing times, and issues with premature gelation or foaming. This necessitates the use of delayed action catalysts (DACs), also known as latent catalysts, which provide an induction period before initiating the polymerization process.

DACs offer several advantages over conventional catalysts, including:

• Extended processing window: Allows for better mixing, mold filling, and shaping of the PU system before the reaction accelerates.
• Improved control over reaction rate: Enables precise control over the curing process and final material properties.
• Enhanced storage stability: Prevents premature reaction during storage of the PU components.
• Reduced volatile emissions: Some DACs decompose into less volatile products compared to traditional amine catalysts.
• Better surface finish: Controlled reaction kinetics can minimize surface defects and improve aesthetics.

This article explores the different types of DACs available for PU systems, their mechanisms of action, and the factors influencing their selection for specific applications.

2. Types of Polyurethane Delayed Action Catalysts

DACs can be broadly classified based on their activation mechanism and chemical structure. The major categories include:

2.1 Blocked Catalysts:

These catalysts are chemically modified or complexed with a blocking agent that prevents their catalytic activity at ambient temperatures. Upon exposure to a specific stimulus, such as heat or moisture, the blocking agent is released, regenerating the active catalyst.

• Blocked Amines: Tertiary amines are commonly used PU catalysts. They can be blocked with various compounds, including carboxylic acids, phenols, and isocyanates.

  • Carboxylic Acid Blocked Amines: These catalysts are neutralized by carboxylic acids, forming a salt. At elevated temperatures, the acid dissociates, releasing the free amine to catalyze the urethane reaction. The activation temperature is dependent on the strength of the acid used. Stronger acids require higher temperatures for dissociation.

    • Example: DABCO® BL-17 (Air Products) is a blocked amine catalyst based on triethylenediamine (TEDA) and a carboxylic acid. It offers a delayed onset of reactivity in PU foams and coatings.

  • Phenol Blocked Amines: Similar to carboxylic acid blocked amines, these catalysts utilize phenols as blocking agents. The dissociation of the phenol occurs at higher temperatures compared to carboxylic acids.

  • Isocyanate Blocked Amines: Amines can react with isocyanates to form urea derivatives, effectively blocking their catalytic activity. At elevated temperatures, the urea bond cleaves, releasing the amine and regenerating the isocyanate. This type of catalyst is particularly useful in one-component PU systems.

    • Example: Jeffcat® ZR-50 (Huntsman) is an isocyanate-blocked amine catalyst designed for use in moisture-cure PU coatings and adhesives.

  • Characteristics: Blocked amines offer excellent latency and are generally used in applications requiring higher activation temperatures. The choice of blocking agent dictates the activation temperature and influences the overall reaction profile.

• Blocked Organometallic Catalysts: Organometallic catalysts, such as tin compounds, can also be blocked to achieve delayed action. Blocking agents include chelating ligands or organic acids.

  • Example: Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) can be blocked with beta-diketones or organic acids. These blocked catalysts provide enhanced latency and improved storage stability.

  • Characteristics: Blocked organometallic catalysts are generally more potent than blocked amines. The activation temperature is determined by the stability of the blocking complex.

2.2 Thermally Activated Catalysts:

These catalysts undergo a chemical transformation at elevated temperatures, leading to the formation of active catalytic species. The transformation can involve decarboxylation, deamination, or other thermal decomposition reactions.

• Metal Carboxylates: Certain metal carboxylates, such as zinc carboxylates and bismuth carboxylates, exhibit delayed catalytic activity due to their relatively low activity at ambient temperatures. At elevated temperatures, they become more active, accelerating the urethane reaction.

  • Example: Zinc octoate is a commonly used metal carboxylate catalyst in PU systems. It provides a balance between reactivity and latency.

  • Characteristics: Metal carboxylates offer good latency and are less sensitive to moisture compared to traditional amine catalysts. They are often used in combination with other catalysts to achieve desired reaction profiles.

• Latent Lewis Acid Catalysts: These catalysts are typically Lewis acids that are initially present in a complexed or inactive form. Upon heating, the complex dissociates, releasing the active Lewis acid to catalyze the urethane reaction.

  • Example: Metal triflates complexed with ligands can be used as latent Lewis acid catalysts.

  • Characteristics: Latent Lewis acid catalysts offer high catalytic activity and can be used in a wide range of PU applications.

2.3 Moisture Activated Catalysts:

These catalysts are activated by moisture, which triggers a chemical reaction that generates the active catalytic species.

• Hydrolyzable Metal Compounds: Certain metal compounds, such as metal alkoxides, undergo hydrolysis in the presence of moisture, generating metal hydroxides that can catalyze the urethane reaction.

  • Example: Titanium alkoxides can be used as moisture-activated catalysts in PU systems.

  • Characteristics: Moisture-activated catalysts are particularly useful in moisture-cure PU systems, where the reaction is initiated by atmospheric moisture.

2.4 Photoactivated Catalysts:

These catalysts are activated by exposure to light, typically UV or visible light. The light energy triggers a chemical reaction that generates the active catalytic species.

• Photoacid Generators (PAGs): PAGs are compounds that generate strong acids upon exposure to light. These acids can then catalyze the urethane reaction.

  • Example: Diaryliodonium salts and triarylsulfonium salts are commonly used PAGs in PU coatings and adhesives.

  • Characteristics: Photoactivated catalysts offer precise control over the reaction initiation and are particularly useful in applications where localized curing is required.

3. Factors Influencing Catalyst Selection

The selection of the appropriate DAC for a specific PU system depends on several factors, including:

• Type of PU system: Flexible foam, rigid foam, elastomer, coating, adhesive.
• Desired reaction profile: Gel time, tack-free time, cure time.
• Processing conditions: Temperature, pressure, humidity.
• Component compatibility: Catalyst solubility and compatibility with polyols, isocyanates, and other additives.
• Desired material properties: Mechanical strength, elongation, hardness, chemical resistance.
• Environmental regulations: Volatile organic compound (VOC) content, toxicity.

3.1 System Type and Reaction Profile

The type of PU system dictates the desired reaction profile. For example, in flexible foam applications, a controlled rise time and cell structure development are crucial. DACs that provide a delayed onset of reactivity and gradual acceleration are preferred. In contrast, in rigid foam applications, a faster reaction rate is often desired to minimize cycle times.

Table 1 summarizes the typical catalyst requirements for different PU system types.

Table 1: Catalyst Requirements for Different PU System Types

PU System Type	Desired Reaction Profile	Typical Catalyst Type
Flexible Foam	Delayed onset, gradual acceleration	Blocked amines, metal carboxylates
Rigid Foam	Fast reaction rate, short cycle time	Strong amine catalysts, organometallic catalysts
Elastomer	Controlled cure rate, good mechanical properties	Metal carboxylates, blocked organometallic catalysts
Coating	Good flow and leveling, fast drying	Photoactivated catalysts, blocked amines
Adhesive	High bond strength, fast setting	Moisture-activated catalysts, blocked amines

3.2 Processing Conditions

The processing conditions, such as temperature, pressure, and humidity, can significantly influence the performance of DACs. The activation temperature of blocked catalysts should be carefully matched to the processing temperature to ensure optimal latency and reactivity. Moisture-activated catalysts are sensitive to humidity and may require careful control of the moisture content in the system.

3.3 Component Compatibility

The catalyst must be compatible with the other components of the PU system, including the polyol, isocyanate, and additives. Poor compatibility can lead to phase separation, sedimentation, or reduced catalytic activity. It is important to select a catalyst that is soluble and stable in the PU formulation.

3.4 Material Properties

The choice of catalyst can also affect the final material properties of the PU product. For example, certain catalysts can promote specific reactions, such as the trimerization of isocyanates, leading to increased crosslinking and improved thermal stability. Other catalysts can influence the cell structure of PU foams, affecting their density and mechanical properties.

3.5 Environmental Regulations

Environmental regulations are increasingly stringent, particularly regarding VOC emissions and the use of toxic chemicals. It is important to select catalysts that comply with these regulations. Some DACs decompose into less volatile products compared to traditional amine catalysts, reducing VOC emissions.

4. Performance Parameters of Delayed Action Catalysts

Several key parameters influence the performance of DACs, including:

• Activation Temperature (T_a): The temperature at which the catalyst becomes active and initiates the urethane reaction.
• Catalytic Activity (k): The rate at which the catalyst accelerates the urethane reaction.
• Latency (t_L): The time period before the catalyst becomes active and the reaction begins to accelerate.
• Selectivity (S): The ability of the catalyst to selectively promote specific reactions, such as the urethane reaction or the trimerization reaction.
• Compatibility (C): The ability of the catalyst to dissolve and remain stable in the PU formulation.
• Storage Stability (SS): The ability of the catalyst to maintain its activity over time during storage.

These parameters can be measured using various techniques, such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheometry, and gel time measurements.

Table 2 summarizes the typical performance characteristics of different types of DACs.

Table 2: Performance Characteristics of Different Types of DACs

Catalyst Type	Activation Temperature (Ta)	Catalytic Activity (k)	Latency (tL)	Selectivity (S)	Compatibility (C)	Storage Stability (SS)
Carboxylic Acid Blocked Amines	80-120 °C	Moderate	Good	Urethane	Good	Good
Phenol Blocked Amines	120-150 °C	Moderate	Excellent	Urethane	Good	Excellent
Isocyanate Blocked Amines	100-140 °C	Moderate	Good	Urethane	Good	Good
Blocked Organometallic Catalysts	60-100 °C	High	Good	Urethane, Trimerization	Moderate	Good
Metal Carboxylates	25-80 °C	Low to Moderate	Moderate	Urethane	Good	Good
Latent Lewis Acid Catalysts	50-100 °C	High	Moderate	Urethane, Trimerization	Moderate	Moderate
Moisture Activated Catalysts	Ambient	Moderate	Moderate	Urethane	Moderate	Poor
Photoactivated Catalysts	Light Exposure	High	Excellent	Urethane	Moderate	Good

5. Applications of Delayed Action Catalysts

DACs are used in a wide range of PU applications, including:

• Flexible Foams: DACs are used to control the rise time and cell structure of flexible foams, improving their comfort and durability.
• Rigid Foams: DACs are used to accelerate the reaction rate and reduce cycle times in rigid foam production.
• Elastomers: DACs are used to control the cure rate and improve the mechanical properties of PU elastomers.
• Coatings: DACs are used to improve the flow and leveling of PU coatings, as well as to reduce VOC emissions.
• Adhesives: DACs are used to provide fast setting and high bond strength in PU adhesives.
• Sealants: DACs are used to control the cure rate and improve the weather resistance of PU sealants.
• CASE (Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, Elastomers): DACs offer tailored reactivity, improved shelf life, and enhanced performance across various CASE applications.

6. Recent Advances and Future Trends

Ongoing research efforts are focused on developing new and improved DACs with enhanced performance characteristics, including:

• Lower activation temperatures: DACs that can be activated at lower temperatures, reducing energy consumption and enabling the use of heat-sensitive substrates.
• Higher catalytic activity: DACs that exhibit higher catalytic activity, allowing for lower catalyst loadings and improved reaction rates.
• Improved compatibility: DACs that are more compatible with a wider range of PU components, simplifying formulation and improving product performance.
• Environmentally friendly catalysts: DACs that are derived from renewable resources and have lower toxicity, reducing environmental impact.
• Smart catalysts: DACs that respond to multiple stimuli, such as temperature, light, and pH, enabling more precise control over the reaction process.
• Microencapsulated Catalysts: Encapsulation allows for precise control over the release of the catalyst, offering enhanced latency and improved compatibility in multi-component systems. The shell material can be designed to break upon specific stimuli, such as heat, pressure, or chemical reaction.
• Supramolecular Catalysts: Utilizing supramolecular chemistry to construct catalyst assemblies that exhibit enhanced activity and selectivity through cooperative effects. This approach allows for the fine-tuning of catalyst properties by modifying the supramolecular structure.

7. Conclusion

Delayed action catalysts are essential components of PU systems, providing enhanced processing control, improved product quality, and reduced environmental impact. The selection of the appropriate DAC depends on several factors, including the type of PU system, desired reaction profile, processing conditions, and material properties. Ongoing research efforts are focused on developing new and improved DACs with enhanced performance characteristics and environmental friendliness. The future of PU chemistry will likely see the development of more sophisticated and responsive catalysts that enable the creation of advanced materials with tailored properties. Continued advancements in catalyst technology are crucial for expanding the applications of PU materials and meeting the evolving needs of various industries.

Literature Cited

1. Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1985). Polyurethane Handbook: Chemistry-Raw Materials-Processing-Application. Hanser Publications.
2. Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
4. Ashida, K. (2006). Polyurethane and Related Foams: Chemistry and Technology. CRC Press.
5. Hepburn, C. (1992). Polyurethane Elastomers. Elsevier Science Publishers.
6. Szycher, M. (1999). Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes. CRC Press.
7. Prociak, A., Ryszkowska, J., & Utrata-Wesołek, A. (2016). Polyurethane Chemistry, Technology, and Applications. CRC Press.
8. Klempner, D., Frisch, K. C., & Hagarty, R. J. (2012). Polymeric Foams. Hanser Publications.
9. Billmeyer, F. W. (1984). Textbook of Polymer Science. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Allport, D. C., Gilbert, D. S., & Outterside, S. M. (2003). MDI and TDI: Safety, Health and the Environment. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Brydson, J. A. (1999). Plastics Materials. Butterworth-Heinemann.
12. Ulrich, H. (1996). Introduction to Industrial Polymers. Hanser Publications.
13. Kresta, J. E. (1982). Polymer Additives. Plenum Press.
14. Mascia, L. (1989). The Chemistry of High-Performance Polymers. Noyes Publications.
15. Bauer, D. R., & Dickie, R. A. (2012). Optical Properties of Polymers. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Wicks, D. A., Jones, F. N., & Pappas, S. P. (2016). Organic Coatings: Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons.
17. Ebnesajjad, S. (2013). Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants. McGraw-Hill Education.
18. Landrock, A. H. (2006). Adhesives Technology Handbook. William Andrew Publishing.
19. Kinloch, A. J. (1987). Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology. Chapman and Hall.
20. Pizzi, A., & Mittal, K. L. (2003). Handbook of Adhesive Technology. Marcel Dekker.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com